期刊文献+

我国声音商标显著性审查标准探析 被引量:11

Examination Standard of Sound Mark Distinctiveness in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从声音商标显著性出发,分析我国现行声音商标审查标准,并结合域外规定探析了我国声音商标审查原则和相关依据;提出了以现有审查标准为基础,增加整体认定原则、在不侵犯他人在先权利和排他性持续使用时间的基础上,引入相关公众认知、广告宣传、动态创新性作为声音商标显著性审查的依据。 Sound mark examination legislation has been existing in European countries for a long period. In order to comply with Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights( TRIPs) agreement and international trend of trademark registration,the new Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China came into effect in May 1 st,2014,which clarified sound mark could be registered for the first time. However,owing to distinctive features of sound mark,protection of sound mark is still in the exploration stage,and development of theoretical basis and practice are not mature and relevant legal system is not perfect either. This paper intends to analyze current examination standard of sound mark in our country from the distinctiveness of sound mark,and explore the principles and basis of sound mark examination by referring to foreign regulations. It is proposed that based on the existing examination standard,principles of overall identity and non-aggression prior rights should be added,and exclusive continuous using time,public recognition,advertising and dynamic innovation should be introduced to the examination basis of sound mark distinctiveness.
出处 《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第5期27-32,共6页 Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 声音商标 显著性 审查标准 sound mark distinctiveness examination standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1彭学龙.商标显著性探析[J].电子知识产权,2005(12):19-21. 被引量:7
  • 2[美]米勒.《知识产权法》[M].法律出版社,2004年版.第164页,第165页.
  • 3Jeremy Phillips, Trade, Mark Law: A Practical Anatomy, Oxford University Press(2003), P92.
  • 4Black & Decker Corp's application, Case R 99/1999-1[1999] ETMR 846.
  • 5Taurus-Film v OHIM(Cine Action), Case T13-5/99 [2001] ETM1K 594 602.
  • 6Climque Laboratories Inc's application, Case R 73/1998-2[1999]ETMR750.
  • 7Sarl Cargo Communication v La Cite de Sciences et de 1' Industrie[1999]ETMR545.
  • 8Barton Beebe, The Semiotic Analysis of Trademark Law. 51 UCLA L. Rev. 621.
  • 9Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc,,537 F,2d 4 (2d Cir. 1976).
  • 10Barton Beebe, The Semiotic Analysis of Trademark Law, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 621.

同被引文献47

引证文献11

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部