期刊文献+

极晚期支架内血栓与支架内再狭窄患者的临床对比分析 被引量:3

Clinical Comparison Between Very-late Stent Thrombosis and Very-late In-stent Restenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析极晚期支架内血栓(VLST)与极晚期支架内再狭窄患者的临床特点,探讨VLST的潜在临床危险因素。方法:入选因急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)入院并经冠状动脉造影证实VLST的患者共21例,另外入选同时期行冠状动脉造影证实极晚期支架内再狭窄的ACS患者共38例作为对照组。比较两组的基线资料、临床检验及检查资料,行Logistic回归分析探讨VLST的危险因素。结果:(1)VLST组有8例(38.1%)近1个月自行停用抗血小板药物,对照组有5例(13.2%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。(2)VLST组有13例(61.9%)以ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)为表现,而对照组均以非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NST-ACS)为表现(100%),两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。(3)两组间年龄、性别、既往高血压、糖尿病、心肌梗死病史、吸烟史及既往介入病史等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(4)与对照组比较,VLST组左心室射血分数(LVEF)显著降低(P=0.001);肌钙蛋白I(Tn I)峰值、N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-pro BNP)峰值均显著升高(P<0.001);白细胞总数及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平也显著升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。(5)两组间超声心动结构、血脂、血糖、肌酐等代谢指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(6)Logistic分析表明,停用抗血小板药物、较高的NT-pro BNP及hs-CRP水平是VLST的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:VLST临床表现危重,坚持抗血小板治疗、改善心功能可能有助于减少其发生。 Objective:To compare the clinical features between very late stent thrombosis(VLST) and very late in-stent restenosis,to discuss the potential risk factors for VLST occurrence.Methods:Our research included in 2 groups:VLST group,21 ACS patients with coronary angiography(CAG) confirmed VLST admitted in our hospital and Control group,38 ACS patients with CAG confirmed very late in-stent restenosis at same period of time.Basic clinical data,laboratory tests and relevant examinations were compared between 2 groups;potential risk factors for VLST occurrence were studied by Logistic regression analysis.Results:(1) There were 8(38.1%) patients discontinued anti-platelet therapy in a month by themselves in VLST group and 5(13.2%) in Control group,P=0.03.(2) 13(61.9%) patients presented as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) in VLST group,while all(100%) patients presented as Non-ST-segment elevation ACS(NST-ACS) in Control group,P0.001.(3) The age,gender,previous histories of hypertension,diabetes,MI,smoking and interventional therapy were similar between 2 groups,P 〈0.05.(4) Compared with Control group,VLST group had decreased LVEF,P =0.001,increased peak values of Tn I and NT-pro BNP,elevated WBC and hs-CRP,all P〈0.001.(5) The index of echocardiography,blood lipid profiles,glucose and creatinine were similar between 2 groups,P〈0.05.(6) Logistic regression analysis showed that discontinued anti-platelet therapy,elevated NT-pro BNP and hs-CRP were the independent risk factors for VLSToccurrence,P〈0.05.Conclusion:VLST may have life-threatening clinical features,insisted anti-platelet therapy and improved cardiac function could reduce VLST occurrence.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第11期1056-1059,共4页 Chinese Circulation Journal
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 支架内血栓 冠状动脉再狭窄 Coronary artery disease In-stent thrombosis Coronary restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

  • 1杜润,张瑞岩.晚期支架贴壁不良研究进展[J].国际心血管病杂志,2008,35(6):353-356. 被引量:4
  • 2韩雅玲.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(12):50-59. 被引量:133
  • 3Moses JW,Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med,2003,349 : 1515-1323.
  • 4Stone GW,Ellis SG, Cox DA,et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent : the TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation, 2004,109 ( 16 ) : 1942 -1947.
  • 5Babapulle MN ,Joseph L, Belisle P, et al. A hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. Lancet, 2004,364 ( 9434 ) : 583-591.
  • 6Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A,et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: Should we be cautious? Circulation,2004,109:701-705.
  • 7Liistro F, Colombo A. Late acute thrombosis after paclitaxel eluting stent implantation. Heart,2001,86: 262-264.
  • 8McFadden EP, Stabile E, Regar E,et al. Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of anti-platelct therapy. Lancet ,2004,364 (9444) : 1519-1521
  • 9Saeko T, Hideaki K, Shinji T, et al. Late angiographic stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circ J,2007,71 (2) : 226- 228.
  • 10Cutlip DE,Windecker S, Mehran R,et al. On behalf of the Academic Research Consortium. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials : A Case for Standardized Definitions. Circulation,2007,115:2344-2351.

共引文献43

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部