期刊文献+

氯吡格雷低反应的老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者换用替格瑞洛后的疗效及出血危险因素 被引量:8

Efficacy and Bleeding Risks of Ticagrelor Replacement for Treating Elderly Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Low Response to Clopidogrel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察替格瑞洛对氯吡格雷低反应的择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后老年急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的疗效,评估治疗过程中出血并发症的危险因素。方法:入选2014-01至2017-01期间945例年龄≥65岁的ACS患者,患者入院后均给予阿司匹林及氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。用血栓弹力图分别测定DAPT≥5 d后患者的血小板抑制率,根据血小板抑制率筛选出氯吡格雷低反应患者293例,这些患者全部换用替格瑞洛,调整DAPT方案≥5 d后再次检测血小板抑制率,对比患者替格瑞洛更换前后血小板抑制率的变化情况(替格瑞洛组);其余652例患者继续应用氯吡格雷(氯吡格雷组)。采用TIMI出血评估标准,随访3个月,比较氯吡格雷组和替格瑞洛组的出血发生率,并应用Logistic回归分析老年ACS患者应用替格瑞洛发生出血并发症的危险因素。结果:氯吡格雷低反应的293例老年ACS患者换用替格瑞洛后5~7 d、8~14 d、15~90 d,血小板抑制率分别为(51.70±42.90)%、(48.99±41.85)%、(55.08±25.70)%,均显著高于其应用氯吡格雷时的血小板抑制率(14.50±24.15)%,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。替格瑞洛组大出血发生率与氯吡格雷组相比,差异无统计学意义(P=0.96)。Logistic多因素分析提示,女性(OR=4.329,P=0.000)、低体重(OR=0.817,P=0.039)、空腹血糖升高(OR=1.251,P=0.028)是老年ACS患者应用替格瑞洛发生出血并发症的独立危险因素。结论:与应用氯吡格雷相比,老年ACS患者应用替格瑞洛能更快、更有效地抑制血小板聚集,且不增加大出血的发生率,安全性高。女性、低体重、空腹血糖升高是择期PCI后老年ACS患者应用替格瑞洛发生出血并发症的独立危险因素。 Objective:To observe the efficacy of ticagrelor for treating elderly acute coronary syndrome(ACS) patients with elective PCI and having low response to clopidogrel;to explore the bleeding risks induced by ticagrelor replacement.Methods:A total of 945 ACS patients ≥ 65 years treated in our hospital from 2014-01 to 2017-01 were enrolled.All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy(DAPT),thrombelastography(TEG) was used to detect platelet inhibition rate when DAPT ≥ 5 days.Based on platelet inhibition rate,the patients were divided into 2 groups:Ticagrelor replacement group,n=293 patients with low response to clopidogrel and switched to ticagrelor treatment,when adjusted DAPT ≥ 5 days,platelet inhibition rate was rechecked to compare the changes;Clopidogrel group,the patients were continuously treated by the same medication,n=652.The patients were followed-up for 3 months,bleeding events were evaluated by TIMI criteria and compared between 2 groups.Risk factors of ticagrelor induced bleeding were assessed by multivariate Logistic regression analysis.Results:Platelet inhibition rates in Ticagrelor replacement group were(51.70±42.90) %,(48.99±41.85) % and(55.08±25.70) % at(5-7) d,(8-14) d and(15-90) d ticagrelor treatment,which were higher than previous clopidogrel treatment(14.50±24.15) %,all P〈0.05.The incidences of severe bleeding events were similar between 2 groups,P=0.96.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis presented that female(OR=4.329,P=0.000),low body weight(OR=0.817,P=0.039) and elevated fasting blood glucose(OR=1.251,P =0.028) were the independent risk factors for bleeding complication in ticagrelor treated elderly ACS patients.Conclusion:Compared with clopidogrel,ticagrelor may faster and more effectively inhibit platelet aggregation without increasing severe bleeding;female,low body weight and elevated fasting blood glucose were the independent risk factors for bleeding complication in ticagrelor treated elderly ACS patients with elective PCI.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第11期1075-1079,共5页 Chinese Circulation Journal
基金 秦皇岛市科技局项目(201602A103)
关键词 急性冠状动脉综合征 血小板聚集抑制率 出血 Acute coronary syndrome Platelet aggregation inhibitiors Bleeding
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1乔蕊,王京,李蕾,张捷.全血电阻法检测血小板聚集程度对抗血小板治疗效果的评价[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(11):1260-1265. 被引量:11
  • 2Mehta SR, YusufS, Peters R J, Bertrand ME, Lewis BS, Natarajan MK, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001,358:527-33.
  • 3Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT 3rd, Fry ET, DeLago A, Wilmer C, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002,288:2411-20.
  • 4Matetzky S, Shenkman B, Guetta V, Shechter M, Beinart R, Goldenberg 1, et al. Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004,109:3171-5.
  • 5Price M J, Endemann S, Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Stinis CT, Levisay JE et al. Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J 2008,29:992-1000.
  • 6Bonello L, Camoin-Jau L, Arques S, Boyer C, Panagides D, Wittenberg O, et al. Adjusted clopidogrel loading doses according to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index decrease rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with clopidogrel resistance: A multicenter randomized prospective study. J Am Coil Cardiol 2008,51:1404-11.
  • 7Bliden KP, DiChiara J, Tantry US, Bassi AK, Chaganti SK, Gurbel PA. Increased risk in patients with high platelet aggregation receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary inter'ention: Is the current antiplatelet therapy adequate'? J Am Coil Cardiol 2007,49:657-66.
  • 8Gurbel PA, Becker RC, Mann KG, Steinhubl SR, Michelson AD. Platelet function monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coil Cardiol 2007,50:1822-34.
  • 9Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R, Blindt R, Angiolillo DJ, Becker R, et al. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. J Am Coil Cardiol 2010,56:919-33.
  • 10Breet N J, van Werkum JW, Bouman H J, Kelder JC, Ruven HJ, Bal ET, et al. Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. JAMA 2010,303:754-62.

共引文献68

同被引文献71

引证文献8

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部