期刊文献+

乒乓球和羽毛球运动员大脑可塑性差异比较 被引量:6

Comparison of Brain Plasticity between Table Tennis and Badminton Athletes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究目的:长期系统化的运动训练会导致大脑运动皮层可塑性改变。在大脑层面上研究和分析项目间的特性,不仅能帮助运动员和教练更精确地了解专项技术特点,更能为训练效果的评价提供客观生理指标。研究方法:研究选用乒乓球和羽毛球项目中常用主动肌第1骨间背侧肌和桡侧腕伸肌,通过单脉冲经颅磁刺激刺激大脑初级运动皮层,产生运动诱发电位(MEP),以此评价大脑运动皮质兴奋性水平。结果:乒乓球运动员第1骨间背侧肌的MEP振幅和斜率显著高于对照组,羽毛球运动员桡侧腕伸肌的MEP振幅和斜率显著高于乒乓球组和对照组。结论:长期、系统的运动训练"有选择性"地增加主动肌肉对应区域的运动皮层兴奋性,能提高皮质内神经募集水平,帮助运动员更好地完成动作输出。 Objective:Long-term and systematic exercise training can lead to plastic changes in motor cortex. Research and analysis on characteristics of different sports in terms of brain level not only helps athletes and coaches to understand the characteristics of sports more accurately,but also provides objective and physiological indicators for selection and training. Methods:This study chooses first dorsal interosseous and extensor carpi radialis which mainly exercised in table tennis and badminton games and produces motor evoked potential(MEP) through single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the primary motor cortex of the brain to evaluate motorcortical excitability. Results:The MEP amplitude and slope of first dorsal interosseous in table tennis athletes were significantly higher than those in the control group. The MEP amplitude and slope of extensor carpi radialis in badminton athletes were significantly higher than those in the table tennis group and the control group. Conclusion:Long-term and systematic exercise training can increase motorcortical excitability of agonist-related region "selectively" and improve recruitment of corticospinal projections to help athletes better achieve motor output.
机构地区 上海体育学院
出处 《中国体育科技》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期127-132,共6页 China Sport Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31371056) 上海市人类运动能力开发与保障重点实验室项目(11DZ2261100)
关键词 运动技能 经颅磁刺激 大脑可塑性 运动皮质兴奋性 运动诱发电位 motor skill transcranial magnetic stimulation: brain plasticity: motorcortical excitabili-ty motor evoked potential
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献61

  • 1Merton PA & Morton HB.Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject.Nature,1980,285 (5762):227.
  • 2Barker AT,Jalinous R,Freeston IL.Noninvasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex.Lancet,1985,2:1106-1107.
  • 3Chen R,Cros D,Curra A,et al.The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation:Report of an IFCN committee.Clin Neurophysiol,2008,119(3):504-532.
  • 4Edwards MJ,Talelli P,Rothwell JC.Clinical applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with movement disorders.Lancet Neurol,2008,7(9):827-840.
  • 5Terao Y & Ugawa Y.Basic mechanisms of TMS.J Clin Neurophysiol,2002,19(4):322-343.
  • 6Cantello R,Tarletti R,Civardi C.Transcranial magnetic stimulation and Parkinson' s disease.Brain Res Rev,2002,38 (3):309-327.
  • 7Cantello R.Applications of transeranial magnetic stimulation in movement disorders.J Clin Neurophysiol,2002,19 (4):272-293.
  • 8Lefaucheur JP.Motor cortex dysfunction revealed by cortical excitability studies in Parkinsons disease:Influence of antiparkinsonian treatment and cortical stimulation.Clin Neurophysiol,2005,116(2):244-253.
  • 9Kobayashi M & Pascual-Leone A.Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.Lancet Neurol,2003,2(3):145.
  • 10Ziemann U.TMS and drugs.Clin Neurophysiol,2004,115 (8):1717-1729.

共引文献28

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部