期刊文献+

国际民商事争议解决中的禁止执行令制度研究 被引量:3

The Research of Anti-enforcement Injunctions in the Settlement of International Civil and Commercial Disputes
原文传递
导出
摘要 起源于百年前的禁止执行令近年来在国际社会重新受到关注。禁止执行令是指一国法院或仲裁庭签发的意在阻止一定范围内执行法院判决或仲裁裁决的限制性命令。它既是禁令,亦是一种临时措施,具有全球性、预防性以及攻击性与保护性并存等特点。近几年来,禁止执行令制度逐渐在英国、美国以及德国等国家的实践中引发关注与争议,在签发的主体资格、签发的条件要素和法律适用等方面有了新的发展。对禁止执行令的有效执行与适当救济,能够有效实现该制度在协调管辖权与促进国际民商事争议公正解决等方面的功能。在解决国际民商事争议的历程中,禁止执行令与"承认和执行"相互补充,具有协调国际利益的功能。随着国际民商事交往的深入发展,禁止执行令的潜在价值将得到更好实现。 Anti-enforcement injunctions get more attentions in international community in recent years. This is an injunction issued by a court or an arbitral tribunal in order to forbid the enforcement of a judgment or an arbitral award in certain range, it is not only an injunction but also an interim measure, which is worldwide and preventable, with both aggressive and protective. In recent years, the injunction continuously brings out attentions and controversies in Britain, America, Germany and other countries, which promote the improvement of the injunction, such as capacity as a subject in it, conditions to i..ssue it and its applicable law. The functions such as coordination of jurisdiction and improvemenlL of international dispute resolution could be achieved better through effective enforcement and proper relief of anti-enforcement injunctions. In the progress of international dispute resolution, anti-enforcement injunctions and "enforcement and recognition" could complement each other. With deeply development of international civil and commercial exchange, the value of anti-enforcement injunctions could be realized better.
出处 《国际法研究》 2017年第6期67-82,共16页 Chinese Review of International Law
关键词 禁止执行令 诉讼 仲裁 管辖权 协调 Anti-enforcement Injunction, Litigation, Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献58

  • 1葛卫民.论司法公正与司法效率[J].政法学刊,2005,22(2):84-86. 被引量:13
  • 2赵千喜.国际商事仲裁中临时措施的法律适用问题-兼及我国仲裁立法的完善[A].仲裁与法律·第97辑[C].法律出版社,2005.12.
  • 3Ali Yesilirmak. Provisional Measures in International Commercial Arbitration[J]. Kluwer Law International 2005, p. 238 ,p. 269.
  • 4Newman, Hill. the Leading ArbitratorsjGuide to International Arbitration[ M ]. Juris Publishing, 2004, p. 217.
  • 5Gary Born. International Civil Litigation in United States[ M]. Commentary and Materials, 3rd end. , Kluwer 1996, p. 484.
  • 6Tijana Kojovic. Court Enforcement of Arbitral Decisions on Provisional Relied - How Final is Provisional? [J]. Journal of International Arbitration Vol. 18, No. 5 (2001), p. 121.
  • 71958年《承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》.
  • 8Possible Future Work in the Area of International Commercial Arbitration Note by the Secretariat, UNCITRAL, 32nd Sess. , P 119, U.N. Doc. A/CN.9/460 (1999).
  • 9Resort Condominiums Inc v. Bolwell, (1995) XX Year book of Commercial Arbitration 628.
  • 10[英]艾伦·雷德芬、马丁·亨特等著.《国际商事仲裁法律与实践》,林一飞、宋连斌译,北京大学出版社2005年版,第357页.

共引文献83

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部