期刊文献+

拉米夫定与恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎相关慢加亚急性肝衰竭的疗效比较 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨拉米夫定、恩替卡韦两种不同抗病毒药物治疗乙型肝炎相关慢加亚急性肝衰竭患者的疗效。方法收集317例慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者,其中拉米夫定治疗组(150例)、恩替卡韦治疗组(167例),观察两组治疗后4周、8周、12周的MELD评分,及48周时患者的存活情况。应用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,绘制生存曲线。结果两组患者在治疗4周、8周、12周时,ETV组MELD评分均低于LMV组,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗48周时,两组的生存率比较,差异无统计学意义,Log Rank(Mantel-Cox)值为2.98,P>0.05。结论恩替卡韦比拉米夫定在治疗乙型肝炎相关慢加亚急性肝衰竭中更具有临床应用价值。
出处 《海峡药学》 2017年第11期92-93,共2页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1饶慧瑛,郭芳,魏来.2005年美国肝病学会急性肝衰竭诊治和肝移植患者评价指南简介[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2006,14(2):154-156. 被引量:22
  • 2Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association.肝衰竭诊疗指南[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2006,14(9):643-646. 被引量:829
  • 3Poison J, Lee WM, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. AASLD position paper: the management of acute liver failure. Hepatology, 2005, 41 (5) : 1179-1197.
  • 4Sarin SK, Kumar A, Almeida JA, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure : consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL). Hepatol Int, 2009, 3(1 ) : 269-282.
  • 5Lee WM, Stravitz RT, Larsin AM, et al. Introduction to the revised American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Position Paper on acute liver failure 2011. Hepatology, 2012, 55 ( 3 ) : 965-967.
  • 6Deng G, Zhou G, Zhai Y, et al. Association of estrogen receptor alpha polymorphisms with susceptibility to chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology, 2004, 40(2) :318-326.
  • 7Yan Z, Tan W, Xu B, et al. A cis-acting regulatory variation of estrogen receptor α ( ESR1 ) gene is associated with hepatitis B virus related liver cirrhosis. Hum Mutat, 2011,32 ( 10 ) : 1128-1136.
  • 8Bernal W, Auzinger G, Dhawan A, et al. Acute liver failure. Lancet, 2010, 376(9736) : 190-201.
  • 9Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiaodt FV, et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 teriary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med, 2002,137 (12) :947-954.
  • 10Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J, et al. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method. Hepatology, 2010, 51(6): 2117-2126.

共引文献288

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部