期刊文献+

基于时序描述逻辑的故障树分析方法研究 被引量:1

Research on Fault Tree Analysis Based on Temporal Description Logic
下载PDF
导出
摘要 故障树分析法是工业界常用的安全分析方法之一。然而由于其非形式化方法的局限性,难以对软件故障进行形式化验证,更难以描述嵌入式实时系统中事件之间的时序逻辑关系。因此,提出了一种基于时序描述逻辑的故障树分析方法,以解决故障树难以对时序关系进行描述以及难以形式化验证的问题。首先,通过时序描述逻辑对故障树进行时序特征的扩充与规约;其次抽取出用描述逻辑表示的软件安全属性;最后对软件系统进行安全属性建模并通过模型检测工具SPIN形式化验证软件系统是否满足这些属性。以某一机载控制系统环境输入模块为案例,对该案例进行故障树分析和建模并给出该案例的待验证安全属性以及实验分析结果。结果表明,提出的方法是有效的和可行的。 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is one of safety analysis methods which is commonly used in industry. However, as the limitation of its non-formal method,it is difficult to be formal verification of software fault and even to describe the temporal logic relation between events in embedded real-time system. Therefore,in order to solve the problem, a formal fault tree analysis based on Temporal Description Logic (TDL) is proposed. Firstly,the fault tree is extended and constrained in temporal sequence characteristic by TDL. Secondly,safety attributes of software are extracted in the representation of TDL. At last, the safety attributes modeling is carried out in software system which is verified whether to meet these attributes or not by SPIN, a model checking tool. A case of environment input module of airborne control system is given where the analysis and modeling of fault tree is conducted, and its security attributes to be checked and experimen- tal results are achieved. It is showed that the proposed method is effective and feasible.
出处 《计算机技术与发展》 2017年第12期89-92,97,共5页 Computer Technology and Development
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61272083 61100034 61170043) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(NS2014099) 江苏省自然科学基金青年基金项目(BK20130812)
关键词 故障树分析 时序描述逻辑 安全属性 形式化验证 fault tree analysis temporal description logic safety attributes formal verification
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1蒋严冰,邵维忠,张路,麻志毅.UML中衍型的精确定义与分析[J].电子学报,2003,31(z1):2101-2105. 被引量:3
  • 2梅婧,林作铨.从ALC到SHOQ(D):描述逻辑及其Tableau算法[J].计算机科学,2005,32(3):1-11. 被引量:34
  • 3胡军,于笑丰,张岩,李宣东,郑国梁.基于场景构件式实时软件设计的一致性检验[J].软件学报,2006,17(1):48-58. 被引量:13
  • 4马炳先,杜玉越.OWL-S服务操作语义的Petri网描述新方法[J].系统仿真学报,2007,19(A01):69-74. 被引量:3
  • 5WANG H B, ZHOU Q z, SHI Y Q. Describing and verifying Web service composition using TLA reasoning [ C]// SCC 2010: Pro- ceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Services Com- puting. Washington, BC: IEEE Computer Society, 2010: 234- 241.
  • 6MARTIN D, BURSTEIN M, HOBBS J, et al. OWL-S: semantic markup for Web services [ EB/OL]. [2012-04-15]. http://www. w3. org/submission/owl-s.
  • 7The OWL-S Coalition. OWL-S1.2 release. 2004 [ EB/OL]. [ 2012- 04-15]. http://www, daml. org/services/owl-s/1.2/.
  • 8BAADER F, CALVANESE D, McGISINESS D, et al. The descrip- tion logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications [ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 9LUTZ C, WOLTER F, ZAKHARYASCHEV M. Temporal descrip- tion logics: a survey [ C]// Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning. Washing- ton, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2008:3-14.
  • 10BAADER F, BAUER A, LIPPMANN M. Runtime verification u- sing a temporal description logic [ C]//Proceedings of the 7th In- ternational Conference on Frontiers of Combining Systems, LNCS 5749. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009: 149-164.

共引文献66

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部