期刊文献+

DNA提取对微生物多样性测序分析的影响 被引量:2

Influence of DNA Extraction Method on Microbial Diversity Analysis Through Next Generation Sequencing
原文传递
导出
摘要 运用高通量测序技术分析复杂样品中微生物种群的变化情况,已经成为目前微生物研究领域的热点问题之一。而微生物的样品准备,如DNA提取和16S可变区的扩增等,对于测序完成后的数据分析以及微生物原始群落组成的影响是至关重要的。采用国产试剂盒(天根土壤微生物基因组提取试剂盒)和进口试剂盒(MOBIO土壤微生物基因组提取试剂盒)分别对土壤样品和羊瘤胃食糜样品进行DNA提取。然后选取总DNA起始量为25ng,对16S V3可变区进行PCR扩增和文库构建,最后通过数据分析比较不同试剂盒提取的DNA对微生物多样性变化的影响,包括OTU数目、稀释曲线、微生物数量及物种种类等。研究发现,在相同DNA模板量和PCR条件下,进口试剂盒提取的DNA能够获得更多的微生物种类。 Using of high throughput sequencing technology to study the microbial diversity in complex samples has become one of the most hot issues in the field of microbial research. In this new technology, the microbial sample preparation, such as DNA extraction and the amplification of 16S variable region, etc. , is crucial for the data analysis, especially for the microbial community composition analysis. The soil and sheep rumen chyme samples were used to extract DNA by domestic Kit (TIANamp soil DNA Kit) and imported kit (PowerSoil DNA isolation kit) respectively. Then the 25ng total DNA was used to amplify the 16S V3 region, and the final sequencing library was constructed by mixing equal amounts of purified PCR products. Finally, the OTU amount, rarefaction curve, microbial number and species were compared by data analysis. It was found that under the same amount of DNA template and PCR cycle number, the DNA treated by imported kit can obtain more microbial species. But under the same DNA extraction kit and DNA template amount, the proportion of the community composition was not the best with more PCR cycle numbers, although the number of species was much more. This may be due to the excessive expansion of the inferior bacteria, which lead to the microbial composition imbalance.
出处 《中国生物工程杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第11期12-18,共7页 China Biotechnology
基金 北京市科学技术研究院创新团队计划课题资助项目(IG201606C1)
关键词 DNA提取 高通量测序 微生物多样性分析 DNA extraction Next generation sequencing Microbial diversity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1吕莉华,侯先志,王海荣,王贞贞,高爱武.绵羊瘤胃微生物基因组DNA提取方法的探讨[J].畜牧与兽医,2008,40(4):35-38. 被引量:8
  • 2陈敏.土壤样品中DNA提取方法的比较[J].微生物学杂志,2005,25(3):101-104. 被引量:15
  • 3淡瑞芳,龙瑞军,杨予海.瘤胃微生物总DNA快速提取法研究[J].家畜生态学报,2006,27(1):18-21. 被引量:10
  • 4李旦,杨舒黎,罗淑萍,王加启.瘤胃微生物总DNA提取方法的比较[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(9):1-5. 被引量:10
  • 5YEATES C, GILLINGS M R, DAVISON A D, et al. Methods for microbialDNA extraction from soil for PCR amp litlcation [ J]. Biol Proced Online, 1998,1 ( 1 ) :40- 47.
  • 6BROCK T D. The study of microorganisms in situ:progress and problems [ J ]. Symp Soc Gene Microbiol, 1987, 41 : 1-17.
  • 7AMANN R I, LUDWIG W, SCHLEIFER K H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation [ J ]. Microbiological Reviews, 1995,59 ( 1 ) : 143-169.
  • 8ZHOU Ji-zhong, ANN B M, TIEJIE J M. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition[ J]. Appl Environ Microbial,1996,62(2) :316-322.
  • 9TSAI Y L, OLSON B H. Rapid method for dieeet extraction of DNA from soil and sediments [ J ]. Appl Envir Mi- erobiol, 1991,57 (4) : 1 070-1074.
  • 10Bryant M P. Bacterial species of the rumen [J]. Bacterial Rev, 1959, 23: 125-153.

共引文献196

同被引文献22

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部