期刊文献+

4种物理检查方法在前交叉韧带完全断裂诊断中的应用价值 被引量:8

Evaluation of four physical examinations in diagnosis of complete rupture of anterior cruciate ligament
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的·探讨4种物理检查方法在前交叉韧带完全断裂诊断中的应用价值。方法·对2016年7月11日—2017年6月10日100例因单侧膝关节外伤初诊怀疑膝关节韧带或半月板损伤而接受手术治疗患者的资料进行回顾性分析。患者均接受以下物理检查:Lachman试验、前抽屉试验、杠杆试验和轴移试验。以术中关节镜检查结果为金标准,对4种物理检查对于前交叉韧带完全断裂诊断的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、准确度等进行综合性分析。结果·经关节镜检查证实,100例患者中确诊为前交叉韧带完全断裂81例;对于前交叉韧带完全断裂的患者,前抽屉试验、杠杆试验、轴移试验、Lachman试验的灵敏度分别为87.7%、100.0%、97.5%、96.3%,特异度分别为84.2%、78.9%、73.7%、63.2%,阳性预测值分别为95.9%、95.3%、94.0%、91.8%,阴性预测值分别为61.5%、100.0%、87.5%、80.0%,准确度分别为87%、96%、93%、90%,阳性似然比分别为5.6、4.7、3.7、2.6,阴性似然比分别为0.1、0、0、0.1。结论·前抽屉试验确定前交叉韧带完全断裂最有效;杠杆试验排除前交叉韧带完全断裂最有效,且敏感性强,易于操作,对于新鲜、急性损伤及患肢肿胀肥胖患者更为适宜,其诊断价值较高。 Objective · To estimate the value of four physical examination methods in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament complete rupture. Methods · A retrospective study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent surgical treatment for knee joint injury from July 11, 2016 to June 10, 2017. They received four physical examinations including Lachman test, anterior drawer test, lever sign test and pivot shift test. The results of the arthroscopy inspections were used as gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, accuracy and other parameter of four physical examinations were comprehensively discussed. Results · Arthroscopic examination confirmed that 81 patients had complete rupture of anterior cruciate ligament. The sensitivities of anterior drawer test, lever test, pivot shift test and Lachman test were 87.7%, 100.0%, 97.5% and 96.3%, and the specificities were 84.2%, 78.9%, 73.7% and 63.2%, respectively. The positive predictive values were 95.9%, 95.3%, 94.0% and 91.8%, while the negative predictive values were 61.5%, 100.0%, 87.5% and 80.0%, respectively. The accuracies were 87%, 96%, 93% and 90%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios were 5.6, 4.7, 3.7 and 2.6, while the negative ones were 0.1, 0, 0 and 0.1, respectively. Conclusion · Anterior drawer test is the most effective in diagnosing the complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament, while lever sign test is the most effective in excluding one. Lever sign test is the most sensitive and easy to operate, especially for fresh bruise, acute injury, limb swelling and obesity, with high diagnostic value.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第11期1512-1516,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 国家重大科学研究计划(2011CB013300) 上海市卫生系统重要疾病联合攻关项目(2013ZYJB0501) 上海市教育委员会高峰高原学科建设计划(20152224) 上海市卫生系统重要薄弱学科建设项目(2015ZB04904) 上海申康医院发展中心促进市级医院临床技能与临床创新三年行动计划(16CR3088B) 中山市新型研发机构产业化项目(2016F2FC0019)~~
关键词 前交叉韧带断裂 物理检查 诊断 评价 anterior cruciate ligament rupture physical examination diagnosis evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1潘熙春,牛广明,韩晓东,郝粉娥.膝关节韧带损伤的MRI诊断[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2007,39(6):661-663. 被引量:14
  • 2Hardaker WT, Garrett WE, Bassett FH. Evaluation of acutetraumatic hemarthrosis of the knee joint. South Med J, 1990,83:640-644.
  • 3Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cru2ciate ligament instahility in the athlete. Am J Sports Med, 1976,4 (2) :84-93.
  • 4Rosenberg TD, Rasmussen GL. The function of the anterior cruciate ligament during anterior drawer and Lachman's testing. An in vivo analysis in normal knees. Am J Sports Med, 1984, 12(4):318-322.
  • 5Whitehill WR, Wright KE, Nelson K. Modified laehman test for anterior cruciate ligament stability. J Athl Train, 1994,29(3):256-257.
  • 6Hurley WL and Thompson McGuire D. Influences of clinician technique on performance and interpretation of the lachman test. J Athl Train, 2003,38(1) : 34-43.
  • 7Matsumoto H. Mechanism of the pivot shift. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1990, 72(5): 816-821.
  • 8Winters K, Tregonning R. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging of the traumatic knee as determined by arthroseopy[J]. N Z Med J, 2005, 118 (1209):1301.
  • 9Kean DM, Worthington BS, Preston BJ, et al. NMR imaging of the knee:example of nomal anatomy and pathology[J]. Br J Radiol, 1983,56 (666) : 355-364.
  • 10Pietsen MH. Value of radiopgraphie examination of the knee joint fortheorthopedic surgeon[J]. Radiology,2006,46(1) :55.

共引文献36

同被引文献45

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部