论侦讯欺骗的法律规制

How to Determine the Fact of Private Loans with Only Transfer Vouchers——To Analyze with the Samples of 50 Judgments Applied to the Item 17 of Judicial Interpretation of Private Loans

我国刑事诉讼法明文禁止以欺骗的方法获取犯罪嫌疑人的供述,但在司法实践中,为达成侦查讯问的目的而选用欺骗性策略实施讯问通常又是必要的。对通过侦讯欺骗所获供述进行认定和排除的标准,从我国最初确立非法证据排除制度,到该制度不断完善的今天,立法者始终采取回避的态度。这就使得侦查人员在实践中在选用讯问策略时,常常陷入进退两难的司法困境。因此,必须直面欺骗性策略的固有风险和实践必要性,从立法层面对侦讯欺骗进行合理规制,以有利于使讯问的效率和对讯问的制约能够达到一个最佳的平衡点。

The Criminal Procedure Law of China prohibits obtaining a suspect＇s confession by cheating. In judicial practice, however, it＇s usually necessary to interrogate with cheating strategy in order to achieve the purpose. Investigators often have a dilemma in choosing interrogative strategy. Thus, we must face directly the risk and necessity of cheating strategy and regulate reasonably the cheating in investigation from the aspect of legislation, helping getting the best balance between the efficiency of interrogation and the restriction to interrogation.