期刊文献+

高半胱氨酸及MTHFR基因C677T多态性与中国汉族人群脑白质病变的关系 被引量:3

Associations of plasma homocysteine level and MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism with white matter lesions in Chinese Han population
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血浆高半胱氨酸(homocysteine, Hcy)水平和亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, MTHFR)基因C677T多态性与中国汉族人群脑白质病变(white matter lesions, WML)的关系。方法纳入104例WML患者和74例对照者,检测血浆Hcy水平和MTHFR基因C677T多态性,采用改良Scheltens量表评价WML程度。结果WML组血浆Hcy水平[中位数,四分位数间距;16.81(11.33~18.92)μmol/L对11.40(8.28~14.23)μmol/L;Z=5.415,P=0.001]和高同型半胱氨酸血症(hyperhomocysteinemia, HHcy)患者比例(85.6%对54.1%;χ2=28.535,P〈0.001)均显著高于对照组,但MTHFR基因型(χ2=1.255,0.534)和等位基因(χ2=1.057,0.304)频率差异无统计学意义。在104例WML患者中,89例HHcy,15例Hcy正常,改良Scheltens量表评分分别为(8.06±5.61)分和(5.80±2.98)分,HHcy组显著高于Hcy正常组(t=2.324,P=0.027)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,年龄[优势比(odds ratio, OR)1.090,95%可信区间(confidence interval, CI)1.049~1.133;P=0.001]、高血压(OR 1.719,95%CI 1.645~2.307;P〈0.001)和HHcy(OR 1.128,95%CI 1.044~1.219;P=0.002)为WML的独立危险因素。结论HHcy是WML的独立危险因素,而MTHFR基因C677T多态性与WML无关。 ObjectiveTo investigate the associations of plasma homocysteine (Hcy) level and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphism with white matter lesion (WML) in a Chinese Han population.MethodsA toal of 104 patients with WML and 74 controls were recruited. Hcy level and MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism were determined. The degree of severity of the WML was evaluated using a modified Scheltens scale.ResultsThe plasma Hcy level (median and interquartile range, 16.81[11.33-18.92]μmol/L vs. 11.40[8.28-14.23] μmol/L; Z=5.415, P=0.001) and the proportion (85.6% vs. 54.1%; χ2=28.535, P〈0.001) of patients with hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) in the WML group were significantly higher than those in the control group. However, there were no significant differences in the frequencies of C677T genotype (χ2=1.255, P=0.534) and allele (χ2=1.057, P=0.304). There are 89 patients with HHcy and 15 patient with normal Hcy in 104 patients with WML. The modified Scheltens scale score in the HHcy subgroup was higher that in the normal Hcy subgroup (8.06±5.61 vs. 5.80±2.98; t=2.324, P=0.027). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio[OR] 1.090, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.049-1.133; P=0.001), hypertension (OR 1.719, 95% CI 1.645-2.307; P〈0.001), and HHcy (OR 1.128, 95% CI 1.044-1.219; P=0.002) were the independent risk factors for white matter lesions.ConclusionsHHcy is an independent risk factor for WML, whereas the MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism is not associated with WML.
出处 《国际脑血管病杂志》 2017年第9期813-817,共5页 International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
基金 连云港市科技局科研项目(SH1538) 连云港市神经内科学科建设(SH1602)
关键词 高半胱氨酸 亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(NADPH) 多态现象 遗传学 磁共振成像 白质 危险因素 Homocysteine Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2) Polymorphism,Genetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging White Matter Risk Factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献45

  • 1WardlawJM, SmithC, DichgansM. Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(5):483-497. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70060-7.
  • 2PantoniL. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9(7):689-701. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70104-6.
  • 3QureshiAI, MendelowAD, HanleyDF. Intracerebral haemorrhage[J]. Lancet, 2009, 373(9675):1632-1644. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60371-8.
  • 4MeschiaJF. Ischemic stroke as a complex genetic disorder[J]. Semin Neurol, 2006, 26(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-933308.
  • 5HaffnerC, MalikR, DichgansM. Genetic factors in cerebral small vessel disease and their impact on stroke and dementia[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2016, 36:158-171. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.71.
  • 6WardlawJM, SmithEE, BiesselsGJ, et al; STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE v1). Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(8):822-838. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8.
  • 7TaborHK, RischNJ, MyersRM. Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2002, 3(5):391-397. DOI: 10.1038/nrg796.
  • 8PearsonTA, ManolioTA. How to interpret a genome-wide association study[J]. JAMA, 2008, 299(11):1335-1344. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1335.
  • 9DebetteS, BisJC, FornageM, et al. Genome-wide association studies of MRI-defined brain infarcts: meta-analysis from the CHARGE Consortium[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(2):210-217. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.569194.
  • 10SemanM, AdriouchS, HaagF, et al. Ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs): emerging actors in cell communication and signaling[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2004, 11(7):857-872. DOI: 10.2174/0929867043455611.

共引文献33

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部