南海仲裁结果逻辑瑕疵的法律分析及应对建议

Legal Analysis and Follow-up to the Logical Defects of the Arbitration Results in the South China Sea

南海仲裁案于2016年7月12日公布了最终裁决结果,仲裁庭几乎满足了菲律宾提出的所有仲裁请求,其中对中国危害最大的莫过于认定"九段线"缺乏法律依据。仲裁裁决在法理上存在严重的逻辑瑕疵,仲裁庭理应无管辖权,"管辖权裁决"自开始即缺乏合法性,最终实体裁决结果与《联合国海洋公约》的基本精神背道而驰,且罔顾事实忽视中国在南海早已形成的历史性权利。中国虽然不接受南海仲裁结果,但不应使仲裁案成为阻碍中国融入国际社会、遵守国际法治的负资产。相反,应该以仲裁案为契机,重视国际司法人才的培养,增强法治话语权,成为国际法则的制定者,唯有如此,才能在国际司法争端中有力地维护国家利益。

South China Sea arbitration case as a political farce staged on July 12,announced the final ruling,the arbitration tribunal almost meet the request for arbitration in Philippines,on China's harm the biggest nothing better than identified"nine section line"the lack of legal basis.Arbitration award in the legal existence of serious logic flaws,the arbitral tribunal can not get the jurisdiction,the results of the arbitration and the"United Nations Convention on the sea,"the basic spirit of the contrary.So ignoring the fact that regardless of the Chinese in the South China Sea has already formed the ruling of the historic rights,the Chinese government to adhere to the"do not accept,do not recognize"position.China has always been a strong defender of international rule of law and builders,although not accept the results of the South China Sea arbitration,but should not make it become a hindrance to our country into the international community to comply with the international rule of law,the negative equity.On the contrary,our country should this opportunity to attach importance to the cultivation of international judicial personnel,not only to become participants in the international rule of law.