期刊文献+

疟疾快速检测方法的应用研究

Study on the Application of the Testing Methods on the Rapid Diagnosis of Malaria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨三种疟疾检测方法在疟疾快速诊断中的应用价值。方法:收集深圳市第二人民医院、深圳市国际旅行保健中心2015年10月至2017年3月疑似疟疾全血标本78例,分别用镜检、荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(PCR)法和快速检测试纸条法(RDT)进行疟疾检测,并对3种方法进行比较分析。结果:78例患者标本用镜检、荧光定量PCR法和RDT法检测疟疾阳性率,结果分别为71.1%、75.0%、72.4%,组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。以镜检为标准,荧光定量PCR法检测疟疾的灵敏度为92.6%,特异性为68.2%,阳性预警值为87.8%,阴性预警值为78.9%;RDT法检测疟疾的灵敏度为94.4%,特异性为81.8%,阳性预警值为92.7%,阴性预警值为85.7%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:荧光定量PCR法和RDT法可作为镜检法的有效补充,RDT在疟疾快速诊断中具有一定的优势。 Objective To investigate application value of three testing methods on the rapid diagnosis of malaria.Methods 78 blood samples of suspicious positive malaria which were from October 2015 to March 2017 in Shenzhen were detected by used light microscopy(LM),fluorescence quantitative PCR assay and RDT.Results The positive rates of LM,PCR assay and RDT were 71.1 %,75 %and 72.4 %respectively,there was no significant difference among the three methods(P〈0.05);Compared to microscopy, the sensitivity of PCR was 92.6 %, specificity 68.2%, positive predictive value 87.7 %, negative predictive value 78.6 %.Compared to microscopy, the sensitivity of RDT was 94.4 %, specificity 81.8 %, positive predictive value 92.7 %, negative predictive value 85.7 %. Conclusions In the diagnosis and curative checking of malaria,RDT and PCR could be used as complement methods of the LM.RDT has some advantages in the rapid diagnosis of malaria.
出处 《深圳中西医结合杂志》 2017年第19期68-70,共3页 Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
基金 深圳市科技计划项目资助课题(JCYJ20150330102720128)
关键词 疟疾 镜检法 荧光定量聚合酶链式反应法 快速检测试纸条法 Malaria Light microscopy Fluorescence quantitative PCR RDT
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1World Health Organization. New perspectives: malaria diagnosis. Joint WHO/USAID informal consultation. World Health Organization. Geneva. 2000 : 1091.
  • 2Greenwood BM, Armstrong JR. Comparison of two simple methods for determining malaria parasite density. Tran R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 1991,85 (2) :186-188.
  • 3Ohrt C, Purnomo, Sutamihardja MA, et al. Impact of microscopy error on estimates of protective efficacy in malaria-prevention trials. J Infect Dis, 2002,186(4) :540-546.
  • 4Rubio JM, Buhigas I, Subirats Met al. Limited level of accuracy provided by available rapid diagnosis tests for malaria enhances the need for PCR based reference laboratories. J Clin Microbio1,2001,39 (7) :2736-2737.
  • 5Rougemont M, Van Saanen M, Sahli R, et al. Detection of four Plasmodium species in blood from humans by 18S rRNA gene subunit-based and species-specific real-time PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol, 2004,42 ( 12 ) : 5636 -5643.
  • 6Perandin F, Manca N, Calderaro A, et al. Development of a real- time PCR assay for detection of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, and Plasmodium ovale for routine clinical diagnosis. J Clin Microbio1,2004,42 (3) : 1214-1219.
  • 7Imirzalioglu C, Soydan N, Schaller M, et al. Diagnosis of mixed Plasmodium malariae and P. vivax infection in a development aid volunteer by examination of bone-marrow specimens by real-time PCR. J Clini Microbiol,2006,44(6) :2307-2310.
  • 8Berry A, Fabre R, Benoit-Vical F, et al. Contribution of PCR-based methods to diagnosis and management of imported malaria. Med Trop ,2005,65 (2) : 176-183.
  • 9陶玉滨,许勇臣,杨利.基因扩增检测四种感染人的疟原虫种类、数量的方法[J].实用预防医学,2008,15(4):1044-1047. 被引量:5
  • 10诸欣平,刘强,周蕾,姜洪杰,牛春,陈沛泉.套式聚合酶链式反应诊断恶性疟原虫及混合感染的研究[J].中国寄生虫病防治杂志,1999,12(1):16-19. 被引量:16

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部