欧美体育社会学研究中的作者、机构及合作特征

Characteristics of the authors,institutions and cooperation in sports sociological research in Europe and North America

以刊载于《国际体育社会学评论》《体育社会学杂志》《体育与社会问题杂志》且被SSCI数据库收录的682篇论文为研究样本,运用三角互证法、网络分析法和比较分析法,探讨欧美体育社会学研究中作者、机构及科研合作特征。结果表明,欧洲体育社会学研究存在女性"科研产出之谜",男性、中级职称作者比例高于北美,但北美博士及高级职称作者比例略高于欧洲,且两地均涌现出一批高产的核心作者。在作者科研合作方面,北美作者具有更多科研合作经历,形成密度相对较高的合作网络和数量较多的研究团队。在科研机构方面,欧洲作者主要来自高等院校,而北美作者所在高校的2级科研机构类型相对多元,并形成一批高产和处于科研合作网络中心的研究机构,北美机构合作网络密度也高于欧洲且具有更多的国际合作。

Basing the research samples on 682 theses published on such 3 international peer reviewed journals of sports sociology as International Review of Sports Sociology, Journal of Sports Sociology and Journal of Sports and social Issues and indexed by SSCI database, by applying triangular mutual proof method, network analysis method and com-parative analysis method, the authors probed into the characteristics of the authors, institutions and cooperation in sports sociological research in Europe and North America, and revealed the following findings： in sports sociological research in Europe, there was a women “scientific research output mystery”, the percentage of the male authors with an intermediate title was higher than that in North America, but the percentage of the authors with a doctor degree or a senior title in North America was slightly higher than that in Europe, and a number of highly productive core authors emerged in both regions; in terms of author scientific research cooperation, the authors in North America had more sci-entific research cooperation, having formed density relatively high cooperation networks and number relatively great research teams; in terms of scientific research institution, the Occidental authors were mostly from institutions of higher learning, while the secondary scientific research institutions of universities which North American authors were at were relatively type diversified, and formed a number of highly productive research institutions which were at the center of a scientific research cooperation network, the institutions in North America had a cooperation network cooperation den-sity higher than that of the institutions in Europe and had more international cooperation.