期刊文献+

不同浓度小剂量利多卡因腰硬联合麻醉在老年肛肠疾病患者非PPH中的临床效果观察 被引量:18

Observation on effect of different concentrations and small dose of lidocaine of CSEA in elderly patients with non-PPH anorectal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同浓度小剂量利多卡因腰硬联合麻醉在老年患者肛肠疾病非吻合器痔上黏膜切除术(PPH)中的临床效果。方法选择该院2013-2014年行非PPH肛肠疾病患者120例为研究对象,分为A组(1.5%利多卡因)、B组(1.0%利多卡因)、C组(0.8%利多卡因)和D组,每组30例。A组、B组、C组腰硬联合麻醉,D组采用骶管麻醉。观察患者不同时间点心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)变化及手术前后应激反应情况,记录麻醉操作时间、起效时间、术后恢复活动时间、麻醉效果评级、成功率、术后患者满意度、术者满意度和尿潴留情况。结果 4组患者不同时点MAP、HR比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组、B组、C组患者麻醉起效时间、术后恢复活动时间均明显少于D组(P<0.01),A组术后恢复活动时间长于B组和C组。A组、B组、C组尿潴留患者明显少于D组(P<0.05)。A组、B组患者满意度、术者满意度均为100%。结论 1.0%利多卡因腰硬联合麻醉更适合于高龄肛肠疾病患者非PPH。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of different concentrations and small dose of lidocaine of combined spinal epidural anesthesia(CSEA)in elderly patients with non-procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids(PPH)anorectal surgery.MethodsOne hundred and twenty elderly patients undergoing non-PPH anorectal surgery were selected and randomly dividedin to 4 groups,the group A(1.5%lidocaine),B(1.0%lidocaine),C(0.8%lidocaine)and D,30 cases in each group.The group A,B and C adopted CSEA,and the group D adopted the sacral anesthesia.The changes of mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)at different time points,stress reactions before and after operation,anesthetic operating time,effect onset time,postoperative reactivating time,anesthetic grade,success rate,postoperative patient satisfaction,postoperative surgeon satisfaction and urine retention were recorded.Results MAP and HR at different time points had no statistical difference among 4 groups(P〈0.05).The anesthetic onset time and postoperative activity recovery time in the group A,B and C were significantly less than those in the group D(P〈0.01).The postoperative activity recovery time in the group A was longer than that in the group B and C.The urine retention time in the group A,B and C was significantly less than that in the group D(P〈0.05).The postoperative patient satisfaction and surgeon satisfaction in the group A and B were 100%.Conclusion 1%lidocaine CSEA is more suitable for the elderly patients with non-PPH anorectal operation.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第33期4625-4627,共3页 Chongqing medicine
基金 湖北省卫生计生委科研项目(WJ2017F016)
关键词 利多卡因 腰硬联合麻醉 骶管阻滞 肛肠手术 lidocaine combined spinal epidural anesthesia sacral blocking anorectal surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1郑颖梅,沈跃华,程建新,徐建国.罗比卡因等比重液用于老年病人腰-硬联合阻滞的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):174-176. 被引量:84
  • 2夏智群,王志勇,于泳浩,王国林.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼用于老年患者腰麻的最低有效剂量[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(11):1021-1023. 被引量:18
  • 3KAPRAL S,GOLLMANN G, WALTL B,et al. Tramadol added to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of an axillary brachial plexus blockade [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1999,88 : 853 - 856.
  • 4HERMAN N L,CALICOTT R, VAN DECAR T K,et al. Determination of the dose-response relationship for intrathecal sufentanil in laboring patients [ J ]. Anesth A nalg, 1997,84 : 1256 - 1261.
  • 5STOCKS G M, HALLWORTH S P, FERNANDO R, et al. Minimum local analgesic dose of intrathecal bupivacaine in labor and the effect of intrathecal fentanyl[ J ] Anesthesiology,2001,94:593 - 598.
  • 6SONI A K, MILLER C G, PRATT S D, et al. Low dose intrathecal ropivaeaine with or without sufentanil provides effective analgesia and does not impair motor strength during labour: a pilot study[ J]. Can J Anaesth, 2001,48 ( 7 ) :677 - 680.
  • 7WAXLER B, MONDRAGON S A, PATEL S N, et al. Intrathecal lidocaine and sufentanil shorten postoperative recovery after outpatient rectal surgery [ J ]. Can J Anaesth, 2004,51 ( 7 ) :680 - 684.
  • 8ASEHNOUNE K, LAROUSSE E, TADIE J M, et al. Small-dose bupivacaine-sufentanil prevents cardiac output modifications after spinal anesthesia[J]. Anesth Analg, 2005,101 ( 5 ) : 1512 - 1515.
  • 9张东铭主编.大肠肛门局部解剖与手术学.安徽科学技术出版社,2001;342-356.
  • 10张明园.精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科技出版社,1999.81-94.

共引文献26

同被引文献140

引证文献18

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部