刑诉中直接证据与间接证据的划分标准探讨

The Standard Discussion of Direct Evidence and Indirect Evidence in Criminal Procedure

直接证据与间接证据这一学术问题一直不乏讨论的空间,经过学者多年讨论已经基本形成相对稳定的划分标准。从其三个组成要素出发,探讨该标准所存在的逻辑和适用问题,提供更多的分析角度与探讨空间;从该证据分类所针对的对象出发,探讨其若是查证属实之前的证据,则有违探讨证据分类问题的初衷,若是查证属实之后的证据,则在适用时就和该分类标准本身大相径庭。对于此证据分类或应另辟蹊径,寻求更好的分类方法。

The academic question o f direct evidence and indirect evidence has been discussed.After years of discussion scholars have basically formed a relatively stable division standard.Based on the three components of this standard, this paper analyzes the logic and application problems and provides more angle and space of exploration. From the object of the evidence classification,it is contrary to the original intention of the evidence classification if it s not verified,or is quite different from the classification standard itself if it is verified when applied. So the alternative approach of the evidence classification should be taken to seek better classification methods.