期刊文献+

权力转移理论视角下的中俄美中亚格局演变 被引量:4

The Evolution of Strategic Structure Shaped by China,Russia and the US in Central Asia from the Perspective of Power Transition Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,中俄美分别提出了自己的中亚战略。俄罗斯和美国试图巩固自己在中亚的地位,在中国"一带一路"规划中,中亚地区也被囊括在"丝绸之路经济带"的范畴之内,形成三国中亚战略交错和对冲的局面。基于奥根斯基的权力转移理论,对这一事实进行深入的解读和剖析,可以发现,冷战后中亚地区经历了从权力真空到美俄争霸,再到中俄美不等边三角关系形成的不同发展阶段,客观上形成了权力转移的事实。中俄美三者的中亚战略在地区指向方面有较多的重叠,但从战略意图到具体实施具有较大差异性。中国无意参与中亚地区争霸,但由于国家实力与战略意愿的提升,客观上会导致中国在该地区权力和影响力的上升。 In recent years, China, Russia and the United States have respectively proposed their strategiesconcerning Central Asia. Russia and the United States seek to consolidate their position in Central Asia. Inthe Belt and Road Initiative, the Central Asian region has been incorporated into the “Silk Road EconomicBelt”. The situation of strategic overlap and conflict among the three countries has thus been formed. Basedon the power transition theory, a thorough analysis of the circumstance reveals that, after the Cold War, theCentral Asian region has experienced three stages: power vacuum, competition between the US and Russia,and a scalene triangle relationship among China, Russia and the US, which objectively shaped the fact thatthe power is being transferred. Strategies of China, Russia and the US concerning this region have over?lapped in various aspects, but it is quite different in both strategic intent and its implementation. AlthoughChina has no intention to participate in the Central Asian hegemony, the development of China?s nationalstrength and strategic vision will lead to the increase of China?s power and influence in the region.
机构地区 中国政法大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第12期23-32,共10页 Pacific Journal
基金 教育部人文社科研究一般项目"中美合作机制与新型大国关系构建研究"(13YJAGJW004)的阶段性成果
关键词 权力转移理论 丝绸之路经济带 中亚格局 the power transition theory Silk Road Economic Belt The pattern of Central Asia
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献126

  • 1杨恕,王术森.丝绸之路经济带:战略构想及其挑战[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2014,42(1):23-30. 被引量:101
  • 2王志民.建设南方“丝绸之路经济带”的地缘环境探析[J].当代世界与社会主义,2015(1):118-124. 被引量:8
  • 3H. Gardner, Dangerous Crossroad, Europe, Russia and the Future of NATO, London, 1997 , p. 140.
  • 4Edited by B. Rumer, Central Asia: At the End of the Transition, New York, 2005, p. 41.
  • 5S. Frederick Starr, The War against Terrorism and U. S. Bilateral Relations with the Nations of Central Asia, 13 December 2001, http://www.cacianalyst.org/Publications/StarrTestimony. htm.
  • 6B95077: The Former Soviet Union and U. S. Foreign Assistance, Curt Tarnoff, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division, April 18, 2001, http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/ CRSreports/international/inter-33. cfm.
  • 7Jim Nichol, Central Asia's New States: Political Developments and Implications for U. S. Interests, CRS ISSUE BRIEF FOR CONGRESS, Updated May 9, 2003,PDF File, p. 18.
  • 8Jim Nichol, Central Asia's New States: Political Developments and Implications for US Interests, CRS ISSUE BRIEF, 1996, Washington, Library of Congress, cited from Bulent Aras, U. S. -Central Asian Relations: A View from Turkey, MIDDLE EAST REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, Issue # 1/ January, 1997.
  • 9Cited from IB93108: Central Asia's New States: Political Developments and Implications for U. S. Interests, Jim Nichoi Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division, May 18, 2001.
  • 10IB93108: Central Asia's New States: Political Developments and Implications for U. S. Interests, Jim Nichol Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division, May 18, 2001.

共引文献58

同被引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部