期刊文献+

基于信号传播算法的在线医疗咨询反馈内容评估方法 被引量:2

Evaluating Online Healthcare Consultation Feedbacks Based on Signal Transmission Algorithm
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】设计并实现一种无监督的算法,对在线医疗咨询服务中医生反馈内容的准确性进行自动评估。【方法】基于大量的在线咨询记录构造词汇之间的共现关系,将其作为对给定咨询问题的标准反馈进行预测的统计模型。通过比较实际反馈和标准反馈之间的相似性,可以获得医生反馈内容的准确性。【结果】通过对"好大夫在线"上的咨询记录进行评估,并与人工标注结果比对,本文算法在"严格匹配"和"软匹配"两种条件下可分别得到41.0%和82.4%的准确率。【局限】缺乏对文本中词汇顺序相关信息的考虑。【结论】本文算法可以帮助患者更有效地判断在线医疗信息的准确性,提升患者的就医决策效果。 [Objective] This paper designs and implements an unsupervised algorithm to evaluate the information accuracy of physicians' feedbacks from online consulting service. [Methods] First, we identified word co-occurrence relationships based on large amount of online service records. Then, we built a statistical model to predict standard feedbacks for the given questions. Finally, we decided the accuracy of physicians' answers by calculating content similarity between real feedbacks and the standard ones. [Results] We examined the proposed algorithm with records from Haodf.com as well as manually labeled results. The accuracy rates were 41.0% and 82.4% for rigorous and relax matching. [Limitations] We did not include the word sequence information in the algorithm. [Conclusions] The proposed algorithm could help patients know the accuracy of online medical information and improve their healthcare decisions makings.
作者 刘通 杨敬成
出处 《数据分析与知识发现》 CSSCI CSCD 2017年第11期29-36,共8页 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery
基金 国家自然科学基金重点国际(地区)合作项目"开放网络下医疗资源配置和优化的模型 算法及应用研究"(项目编号:71520107003)的研究成果之一
关键词 在线咨询 词汇共现网络 PAGERANK Online Consultation Word Co-occurrence Graph PageRank
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献113

  • 1毛波,尤雯雯.虚拟社区成员分类模型[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,46(z1):1069-1073. 被引量:78
  • 2Nam K K, Ackerman M S, Adamic LA. Questions in, knowledge in: a study of naver' s question answering community[A]/ /Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [ C]. New York : ACM Press, 2009: 779-788.
  • 3Oh S. The relationships between motivations and answering strategies: An exploratory review of health answerers' behaviors in Yahoo I Answers [J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011,48(1): 1-9.
  • 4Agichtein E, Castillo C, Donato D, et al. Finding high quality content in social media[A]//WSDM '08 Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining[C]. New York:ACM,2008: 183-194.
  • 5Shah C, Pomerantz J. Evaluating and predicting answer qualityin community QA[A]/ /SIGIR ' 10 Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval[C]. New York: ACM,2010 :411-418.
  • 6Kim S, Oh S. Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60( 4) : 716-727.
  • 7Jeon J, Croft W B, Lee J H, et al. A framework to predict the quality of answers with non-textual features[A]/ /SIGIR '06 Proceedings of the 29rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval[C]. Washington: ACM, 2006:228-235.
  • 8Ko J, Si L, Nyberg E. A probabilistic framework for answer selection in question answering[A]//Proceedings of NAACL-HLT[C]. Rochester, NY: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007: 524-531.
  • 9Jurczyk P, Agichtein E. Discovering authorities in question answer communitiesby using link analysis[A]//Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management[C].Lisboa:ACM,2007:919-922.
  • 10Liu J, Cao Y. Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization[A]/ /Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL)[C]. Prague,2007 :334-342.

共引文献126

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部