企业跨组织研发合作与创新绩效的曲线关系研究:研发人力资本的中介作用被引量：1

Curve Relation Study on Cross-organizational R&D Cooperation and Innovative Performance:The Mediating Role of R&D Human Capital

下载PDF

导出

摘要提出一个企业跨组织研发合作、研发人力资本、研发投资对创新绩效影响的综合分析框架,并以湖南100家创新型企业为调查对象进行实证检验。研究表明:企业跨组织研发合作对创新绩效有倒U型影响,说明跨组织研发合作不足或过度都会侵蚀创新绩效;研发专用人力资本和研发通用人力资本对倒U型关系起部分中介作用,因此企业必须提升内部人力资本来吸收和整合外部知识;企业研发投资调节跨组织研发合作与创新绩效的倒U型关系,且进一步调节研发人力资本的中介作用。 This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis framework for cross organizational R＆D cooperation, R＆D human capital, R＆D investment on the innovation performance of enterprises. We carried out an empirical study using data collected from 100 innovative enterprises in Hunan Province. The research results show that cross organizational R＆D collaboration has an inverted U effect on innovation performance, which indicates that the lack of Inter Organizational R ＆ D cooperation or excessive will erode innovation performance; R＆D human capital and R＆D universal human capital play a partial intermediary role in inverted U type relationship, so enterprises must enhance internal human capital to absorb and integrate external knowledge; The R ＆ D investment regulates the inverted U type relationship between Inter Organizational R ＆ D cooperation and innovation performance, and further regulates the intermediary role of R ＆ D human capital.

作者王朝晖

机构地区湖南第一师范学院商学院

出处《科技与经济》 2017年第6期81-85,共5页 Science & Technology and Economy

基金湖南省情决策咨询课题--"湖南省大学生创新创业能力培养与评价模式研究"(项目编号:16JCC050 项目负责人:王朝晖)成果之一湖南省社会科学评审委员会一般项目--"中国情景下企业动态双元能力的前因及后果研究"(项目编号:XSP17YBZZ019 项目负责人:王朝晖)成果之一

关键词跨组织研发合作创新绩效研发人力资本研发投资 R＆D collaboration Innovation performance R＆D human capital R＆D investment

分类号 F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1马艳艳,刘凤朝,姜滨滨,王元地.企业跨组织研发合作广度和深度对创新绩效的影响——基于中国工业企业数据的实证[J].科研管理,2014,35(6):33-40. 被引量：55

二级参考文献20

1吴波,贾生华.企业间合作经验的学习效应研究述评[J].研究与发展管理,2007,19(2):14-19. 被引量：6
2Luca Berchicci.Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance[J]Research Policy,2013(1).
3Xiaolan Fu.How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation?[J]Research Policy,2012(3).
4Jin Chen,Yufen Chen,Wim Vanhaverbeke.The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms[J]Technovation,2011(8).
5Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli.The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis[J]Technovation,2011(7).
6S.X. Zeng,X.M. Xie,C.M. Tam.Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs[J]Technovation,2009(3).
7Marion Frenz,Grazia Ietto-Gillies.The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey[J]Research Policy,2009(7).
8AnthonyGoerzen.Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships[J]Strat Mgmt J,2007(5).
9Maurizio Zollo,Jeffrey J. Reuer,Harbir Singh.Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances[J]Organization Science,2002(6).
10PrashantKale,Jeffrey H.Dyer,HarbirSingh.Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function[J]Strat Mgmt J,2002(8).