期刊文献+

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis 被引量:5

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor(TIC) vs. clopidogrel(CLO) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). In Jun 2016, a literature search was started and all the studies were conducted from 2010 to 2015. We systematically searched the literature through the MEDLINE database, Cochrane library, and EMBASE database. Quality assessments were evaluated with Jadad quality scale. Data were extracted considering the characteristics of efficacy and safety designs. Six RCTs enrolling 26 244 participants and satisfying the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed. There was a significant decrease of all-cause mortality(MD=0.83, 95%CI=0.74–0.93, P=0.001) and myocardial infarction(MI)(MD=0.78, 95%CI=0.70–0.88, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in stroke(MD=1.34, 95%CI=0.99–1.79, P=0.06), total bleeding(MD=0.97, 95%CI=0.84–1.12, P=0.66), minor or major bleeding(MD=1.06, 95%CI=0.94–1.19, P=0.35) in patients undergoing PCI after treatment with TIC vs. CLO. TIC could be more significant in decreasing all-cause mortality and MI than CLO, but there were no significant differences between TIC and CLO in inhibiting stroke, major bleeding, major or minor bleeding in patients undergoing PCI. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor(TIC) vs. clopidogrel(CLO) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). In Jun 2016, a literature search was started and all the studies were conducted from 2010 to 2015. We systematically searched the literature through the MEDLINE database, Cochrane library, and EMBASE database. Quality assessments were evaluated with Jadad quality scale. Data were extracted considering the characteristics of efficacy and safety designs. Six RCTs enrolling 26 244 participants and satisfying the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed. There was a significant decrease of all-cause mortality(MD=0.83, 95%CI=0.74–0.93, P=0.001) and myocardial infarction(MI)(MD=0.78, 95%CI=0.70–0.88, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in stroke(MD=1.34, 95%CI=0.99–1.79, P=0.06), total bleeding(MD=0.97, 95%CI=0.84–1.12, P=0.66), minor or major bleeding(MD=1.06, 95%CI=0.94–1.19, P=0.35) in patients undergoing PCI after treatment with TIC vs. CLO. TIC could be more significant in decreasing all-cause mortality and MI than CLO, but there were no significant differences between TIC and CLO in inhibiting stroke, major bleeding, major or minor bleeding in patients undergoing PCI.
出处 《Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences)》 SCIE CAS 2017年第5期675-680,共6页 华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版)
基金 supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81470387) Hubei Province’s Outstanding Medical Academic Leader Program,China
关键词 ticagrelor CLOPIDOGREL percutaneous coronary intervention OUTCOMES META-ANALYSIS ticagrelor clopidogrel percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

共引文献2

同被引文献12

引证文献5

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部