期刊文献+

谵妄预测模型建立和评价的临床研究 被引量:9

To Establish and Evaluate a Prediction Model for Delirium
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过数据分析建立谵妄的预测模型,并对模型进行评价和应用实践。方法:回顾性整理1521例自贡第四人民医院重症医学科住院患者的临床资料,按照是否发生谵妄,分为谵妄组(527例)和非谵妄组(994例),进行Logistic回归分析后建立模型。结果:谵妄预测模型建立为:L=APACHE Ⅱ评分+0.0558×总胆红素+1.191×尿素氮+4.098×饮酒史+2.009×呼吸机,L>51.39,即可预测谵妄发生。预测模型进行评价,模型系数的全局性Omnibus检验,χ~2=1025.74,P<0.001,有统计学意义。模型的灵敏度78.0%,特异度93.5%,漏诊率22.0%,误诊率6.5%。预测概率ROC曲线下面积为0.926,95%置信区间为(0.91,0.94)。结论:谵妄预测模型可运用于临床,对预防患者谵妄带来的不良结局有重要意义。 Objective: Our study was designed to establish and evaluate a predictive model for delirium based on data analysis. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 1521 hospitalized patients in the de- partment of critical care medicine, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital. Patients were divided into delirium group (n= 527) and non-delirium group (n=994) according to whether or not the patient had delirium during hospitalization. We established the model after logistic statistical analysis of these data. Results: We established a prediction model for delirium by data analysis. L= APACHE II score +0.0558×total bilirubin value+1.191 xurea nitrogen+ 4.098xhistory of drinking+2.009xmechanical ventilation. If the value of L is higher than 51.39, it is likely that delirium would occur. We evaluated the prediction model. The global Omnibus test of model coefficients, X^2= 1025.74, P〈0.001, which was statistically significant. The sensitivity of the model was 78%, specificity was 93.5%, missed diagnosis rate was 22%, and misdiagnosis rate was 6.5%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.926, 95% confidence interval (0.91,0.94). Conclusion: The prediction model for delirium could be useful in clinical diagnosis and treatment to prevent the occurs of adverse outcomes.
出处 《神经损伤与功能重建》 2017年第6期532-535,共4页 Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction
基金 四川省医学会重症医学(新晨)专项课题(No.2015ZZ002)
关键词 谵妄 模型 预测 delirium model prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1赵晶平,张瑞霞,杨义明.肝病患者血脂、胆碱酯酶检测的临床价值[J].中国民康医学,2007,19(1):3-5. 被引量:12
  • 2Ely EW,Inouye SK,Bernard GR,et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients:validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit(CAM-ICU)[J]. JAMA, 2001,286: 2703-2710.
  • 3McNicoll L,Pisani MA,EIy EW,et al. Detection of delirium in the intensive care unit:comparison of confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit with confusion assessment method ratings[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc,2005,53:495-500.
  • 4Devlin JW,Fong JJ,Schumaker G,et al. Use of a validated delirium assessment tool improves the ability of physicians to identify delirium in medical intensive care unit patients[J]. Crit Care Med,2007,35(12): 2721-2724.
  • 5Aldemir M,Ozen S,Kara I,et al. Predisposing factors for delirium in the surgical intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care,2001,5:265-270.
  • 6Dubois MJ,Bergeron N,Dumont M,et al. Delirium in an intensive care unit:a study of risk factors[J].Inten Care Med,2001,27:1297-1304.
  • 7Jaber S,Chanques G,Ahairac C,et al. A prospective study of agitation in a medical surgical ICU[J].Chest,2005,128:2749-2757.
  • 8Lepouse C, Lautner CA,Liu L,et al. Emergence delirium in aduhs in the post-anaesthesia care unit[J]. Br J Anaesth,2006,96(6):747-753.
  • 9Ouimet S,Kavanagh BP,Gottfried SB,et al. Incidence,risk factors and consequences of 1CU delirium[J].lnten Care Med,2007,33:66-73.
  • 10Shu-Min Lin,Chien-Da Huang,Chien-Ying Liu,et al. Risk factors for the development of early-onset delirium and the subsequent clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients [ J ]. Sepsis,2008,23 (3) : 72- 379.

共引文献128

同被引文献91

引证文献9

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部