刘勰《原道》之“道”与老子之“道”异同

The Relationship between Liu xie YUAN DAO Article and Lao tze's 'Tao'

刘勰的专著《文心雕龙》在我国文学批评史上意义重大,其中的文学理论一直影响到后世。而《原道》作为其中第一篇理论文章,旨在说明创作文章的目的和意义,是全书的核心。然而早在战国时期,儒家、道家、法家已经将"道"作为论证的核心。刘勰的理论思想很大程度上继承了前人的观点,其与《道德经》之"道"渊源颇深。在深入阐释刘勰《原道》核心内涵的基础上,通过对《文心雕龙》与《道德经》两本著作进行对比,阐释两者之间"道"的异同,说明刘勰《原道》之"道"和老子之"道"的继承变化关系。

Liu xie＇s treatise We XIN DIAO LONG is of great significance in the history of Chinese literary criticism, which has been in-fluenced by the literary theory. As the first article in the book, YUAN DAO aims to illustrate the purpose and meaning of the article, whichis the core of the book. However, as early as the warring states period, Confucian, Taoist and jurist had put ＂Tao＂ as the core of the argu-ment. Liu xie＇s theory is largely inherited from his predecessors, which is deeply related to the ＇Tao＇ of the book of Tao Te Ching. On thebasis of the core connotation of Liu xie＇s YUAN DAO .By comparing the two books of WEN XIN DIAO LONG and Tao Te Ching , thispaper explains the similarities and differences between the two theories, shows the inherita所做的 and development relationship betweenthe two theories.