期刊文献+

“宁案”与中法外交 被引量:1

Nanjing Incident and Sino-French Relationship
原文传递
导出
摘要 1927年3月24日,北伐军攻占南京期间爆发了针对外国人的骚乱,祸及外侨生命和财产,史称"宁案"。事后国民政府与列强展开谈判。法国要求国民政府惩凶、道歉和赔偿,而国民政府则借机提出修订中法不平等条约的要求。修约议题遂成双方争论的焦点。1927年4月至1928年10月,随着国民政府推翻北洋政府逐渐统一全国,法方的态度经历了拒绝修约、有条件修约和无条件修约三个阶段。中法宁案协议的起草和历次修改,反映了法国政府的对华政策从北伐之初的中立观望到逐步承认国民政府合法性的过程。国民党派系斗争、国民政府外交政策的变化、北伐军事成功、中美中英宁案谈判都直接影响了中法协议的内容和谈判进程,展现了北伐期间中外关系的复杂面向。 March 24,1927, when the Northern Expeditionary Army occupied Nanjing, a riot of Chinese soldiers, known as "Nanjing incident", happened against the foreigners and their properties. Afterwards, the French Government demanded the punishment of the soldiers, the apologies and the indemnity, while the Nationalist Government took the opportunity to propose the revision of the unequal treaties between China and France, which became the focus of the debate. Along with the Beijing Government was overthrown by the Northern Expeditionary Army, the attitude of French Government has undergone three stages: refusal to revise the Sino-French treaties, conditional revision of the treaties and unconditional revision of the treaties. The draft and revision of the Sinc^French Agreement between March 1927 and October 1928 reflected the turn of the French Government's policy from the neutrality at the beginning of the Northern Expedition to the recognition of the legitimacy of the Nationalist Government. The conflict between the KMT factions,the changes of the foreign policy of the Nationalist Government, the success of the Northern Expedition, the Sino-British and Sino-American negotiations on the Nanjing incident have directly affected the terms of the Sino-French Agreement,which demonstrated the barometer of the Sino-foreign relations during the Northern Expedition.
作者 侯庆斌
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第12期48-58,共11页 Journal of Historical Science
关键词 “宁案” 中法关系 修约 Nanjing incident Sino-French relation revision of the treaties
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1Morioka to Shidehara, [ 日 ]Akira lriye, After Imperialism: the search for a new order in Fareast, Harvard University Press, 1965, p. 12.9.
  • 2John. V. MacMurray, How the peace was lost: The 1935 Memorandum , California: Hoover Institute Press, 1992, p. 90, p. 92, p. 105.
  • 3陈志奇辑编.《中华民国外交史料选辑》(五》[M].(台》国立编译馆主编,渤海堂文化公司印行,.第2138、2118-2121、2225页.
  • 4陈志奇辑编.《中华民国外交史料选辑》[A]..见《对中国政策纲领》[C].,..
  • 5章伯锋 李宗一.《北洋军阀:1912~1928》(5》[A]..《北洋军阀的覆灭》[C].武汉出版社,1990年版.第525-526页.
  • 6[日]Akira Iriye, After Imperialism: the search for a new order in Fareast, Harvard University Press, 1965, p. 120; Shidehara to Yada, Mar. 26, 1927, JMFA, PVM27, p.131; p.142.
  • 7天津市政协编译组译 [日]土肥原贤二传记刊行会编.《土肥原贤二秘录》[M].中华书局,1980年版.第9页.
  • 8刘耀武译.[日]草柳大藏,《满铁调查内幕》[M].黑龙江人民出版社,1982年版.第238、247-248页.
  • 9[日]信夫清三郎.《日本外交史》(下)[M].商务印书馆,1980年版.第577、520页.
  • 10郭洪茂译 [日]升味准之辅.《日本政治史》第三册《政党的凋落·总力战体制》[M].商务印书馆,1997年版.第588-590页.

共引文献19

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部