法律人思维不存在吗？--重申一种建构主义立场

Doesn't Legal thinking Exist? Reasserting A Constructivist Standpoint

近年来,苏力教授对国内法律人思维研究提出质疑,认为不存在一种独特的法律人思维。这一研究立场值得探讨。各国法治实践证明,法律人思维不仅客观存在,而且具有重要研究价值,并且也确实得到了国内外诸多学理研究。职业化依然是当前我国法治建设的主要任务,而法律职业者的思维与方法在未来中国法治进程中将起到不可替代的建设性作用。法学研究本身应尊重法学学科特有的一些规律。在法律人思维问题上,应形成一些共识性、常识性的内容,并应当成为研究者共同遵循的底线。

In recently, Prof. Su li questions the domestic study of legal thinking and believes distinctive legal thinking is not exist, while such view is worth discussing, The practices of rule by law in various countries not only prove the objective existence of legal thinking, but also it has important research values, which indeed has received many academic studies. Professionalism is still the main task of the rule of law construction in China, and legal thinking and methods will play an irreplaceable and constructive role in the course of China＇ s rule by law. The study of law should respeet some special canons. Some common sense, or even elementary knowledge should be reached, and should be the bottom line that researchers follow.