期刊文献+

DWI-ADC值评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效价值的Meta分析 被引量:4

A meta-analysis of DWI-ADC Value for the Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨用循证医学Meta分析的方法,评估扩散加权成像(DWI)表观扩散系数(ADC)值用于评价乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的准确性。方法通过检索Embase、Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆、其他英文数据库及四大中文数据库中的相关文献,搜集符合纳入标准的原始文献进行质量评价、异质性检验、Meta回归分析及亚组分析,并选择相应的效应合并模型进行Meta分析,汇总敏感度(Se)、特异度(Sp)、阳性似然比(+LR)、阴性似然比(-LR)、诊断比值比(DOR)及汇总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)。结果共纳入13篇英文文献,汇总DWI-ADC值评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的Se、Sp、+LR、-LR、DOR及SROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.89(0.85~0.92)、0.71(0.66~0.76)、3.12(2.41~4.04)、0.20(0.13~0.29)、21.34(11.36~40.10)、0.88。结论 DWI-ADC值变化率在早期预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效中具有重要意义。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy and predictive value of DWI-ADC value in the assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer by Meta-analysis. Methods Relevant studies were retrieved from English and four Chinese databases and assess the quality、data extraction test for heterogeneity、Meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis,then select the appropriate model combined effect Meta-analysis. The combined Se,Sp,LR,diagnostic odds ratios(DOR),and AUC of DW-MRI were analysed. Results 13 eligible studies were included. The combined results of DW-MRI of Se,Sp,LR,DOR and AUC was 0. 89(0. 85-0. 92),0. 71(0. 66-0. 76),3. 12(2. 41-4. 04),0. 20(0. 13-0. 29),21. 34(11. 36-40. 10),0. 88,respectively. Conclusion The variation of DWI-ADC value can predict the assessment of treatment response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第11期1600-1605,共6页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 乳腺癌 化疗 扩散加权成像 表观扩散系数 META分析 Breast cancer Chemothrapy DW-MRI ADC value Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献97

  • 1沈镇宙,柳光宇,苏逢锡,何萍青,杨名添,施俊义,盛援,邹强,李亚芬.多西紫杉醇加表柔比星治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的多中心Ⅱ期临床研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(2):126-128. 被引量:56
  • 2Bhalla K, Harris WB. Molecular and biologic determinants of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locoregional breast cancer. Semin Oncol, 1998, 25 (2 suppl 3): 19-24.
  • 3Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Buzder AU, et al. Residual metastatic axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Am J Surg, 1998, 176:502-509.
  • 4Ellis P, Smith I, Ashley S, et al. Clinical prognostic and predictive factors for primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16:107-114.
  • 5Cameron DA, Anderson ED, Levack P, et al. Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer - 10 - year survival data after chemotherapy and hormone therapy. Br J Cancer, 1997, 76:1099-1105.
  • 6Pierga JY, Mouret E, Dieras V, et al. Prognostic value of persistent node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 2000, 83: 1480-1487.
  • 7Hutcheon AW, Heys SD, Miller ID, et al. Improvements in survival in patients receiving primary chemotherapy with docetaxel for breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2001, 69: 298.
  • 8Chang J, Ormerod M, Powles TJ, et al. Apoptosis and proliferation as predictors of chemotherapy response in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer, 2000, 89: 2145-2152.
  • 9Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A, et al. p53 but not bcl-2 immunostaining is predictive of poor clinical complete response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res, 2000,6: 2751-2758.
  • 10Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Watanabe T, et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Cancer, 2001, 96: 66-73.

共引文献344

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部