期刊文献+

生脉散治疗心肌梗死的系统评价 被引量:2

Shengmai powders for patients with myocardial infarction: a systematic review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]系统评价西药常规加生脉散与单纯西药常规治疗心肌梗死的临床疗效。[方法]计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普(VIP)、万方、Pub Med、EMbase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,搜集西药常规加生脉散与单纯西药常规治疗心肌梗死的临床随机对照试验。按照Cochrane协作网等推荐的方法评价纳入研究的方法学质量和提取有效数据后,采用Rev Man5.3.0软件进行Meta分析。[结果]共纳入11个研究,合计766例患者,其研究质量均为C级。Meta分析结果显示:西药常规加生脉散与单纯西药常规治疗比较,能显著提高心肌梗死临床综合疗效[OR=2.82,95%CI(1.57,5.50),P=0.000 5];减少心肌梗死后心血管事件的发生[OR=0.29,95%CI(0.15,0.54),P=0.000 1];降低内皮素水平[MD=-16.69,95%CI(-24.79,-8.60),P<0.000 1]。[结论]西药常规加生脉散较单纯西药常规治疗,可提高心肌梗死患者的临床疗效。 [Objective] To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effect of western medicine plus Shengmai powers versus simple western medicine in myocardial infarction(MI) patients. [Methods] We systematically searched the CNKI,CBM, VIP, Wanfang, Pub Med, Cochrane Library, Web of science and other related periodicals to identify randomized controlled trials(RCTs). The quality of studies was evaluated according to methods of the Cochrane Collaboration, the data were extracted; and meta-analyses were performed with Rev Man5.3.0 soft ware. [Results]Eleven trials involving 766 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with the simple western medicine treatment, the combination of western medicine and Shengmai powers therapy significantly improved the symptoms, clinical comprehensive effect [OR =2.82,95% CI(1.57,5.50),P =0.000 5], reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction[OR=0.29,95%CI(0.15,0.54),P=0.000 1], reduce the plasma endothelin level [MD=-16.69,95%CI(-24.79,-8.60),P0.000 1]. [Conclusion] The therapeutic effect of combining western medicine with Shengmai powers therapy on myocardial infarction patients is better than that of simple western medicine treatment.
出处 《天津中医药大学学报》 CAS 2017年第6期436-440,共5页 Journal of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 天津市高等学校科技发展基金计划项目(20130202)
关键词 生脉散 心肌梗死 随机对照试验 系统评价 Shengmai powers myocardial infarction randomized controlled trial systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献176

共引文献3161

同被引文献114

引证文献2

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部