期刊文献+

野莴苣及其近似种间亲缘关系研究 被引量:3

Genetic Comparisons Between Lactuca pulchella (Pursh) DC and Its Closely Related Lettuce Species
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用PCR方法对野莴苣及其11种近似种DNA进行扩增,获得ITS、matK和rbcL序列,分析遗传相似系数和聚类分析图谱,探讨野莴苣及其近似种的亲缘关系。通过野莴苣及其近似种ITS序列分析发现:野莴苣和生菜、莴苣、毒莴苣的相似性分别为93.6%、93.1%、92.6%,野莴苣与乳苣的相似性仅为87.8%;matK序列研究发现:野莴苣和生菜、莴苣、毒莴苣的相似性分别为99.2%、99.0%、99.1%,而野莴苣与乳苣的相似性仅为98.3%,结果表明,野莴苣与莴苣属的生菜、莴苣、毒莴苣的亲缘关系更近,与乳苣属的乳苣亲缘关系次之。通过对比rbcL序列发现:野莴苣和生菜相似度达100%,与莴苣、翅果菊、毒莴苣、刺毛莴苣、宿根莴苣的相似度均达99.7%,而野莴苣与乳苣的相似度却为99.4%,将野莴苣归为莴苣属更加合理。 The genetic similarity coefficients and cluster analysis maps on Lactuca pulchella(Lp)and its 11 closely related species were obtained by using PCR to amplify ITS,matK and rbcLgene from the total DNA fragments of the lettuce varieties.Based on the ITS sequences,a similarity between Lpand L.sativa var.ramose was found to be 93.6%;betweenLp and L.sativa,93.1%;between Lp and L.serriola,92.6%;and,between Lp and Mulgedium tataricum,the lowest at 87.8%.According to the matK sequences,a similarity between Lp and L.sativa var.ramose was shown to be99.2%;between Lp and L.sativa,99.0%,;between Lp and L.serriol,99.1%;and,between Lpand M.tataricum,98.3%.It appeared that Lpwas related closer to theLactuca species than Mulgedium.By comparing the rbcL,Lp and L.sativa L.var.ramosa had a perfect match with a 100%similarity;whereas,Lpand L.sativa,L.indica,L.serriola,L.hirsute or L.perennis,at 99.7%;and,Lp and M.tataricum,at 99.4%.Consequently,it was concluded that Lpbelonged to the genus Lactuca.
出处 《福建农业学报》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第10期1077-1081,共5页 Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家质检总局科技计划项目(2015IK043) 国家质检公益性行业科研专项(201410076) 福建省科技计划重大专项(2017NZ0003-1-7)
关键词 野莴苣 近似种 亲缘关系 Lactuca pulchella closely related species genetic relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献83

  • 1伏建国,安榆林.我国濒危物种的进出口管理和查验[J].植物检疫,2007,21(S1):21-24. 被引量:6
  • 2叶婵娟,刘明锋,刘文,周玲艳,杨妙贤,胡延吉,梁红.广东省猕猴桃种质资源rbcL基因的多样性分析[J].仲恺农业工程学院学报,2013,26(4):1-7. 被引量:5
  • 3李朝銮,吴征镒.中国崖爬藤属(TETRASTIGMA(MIQ.)PLANCH.)植物系统分类研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,1995,1(4):307-333. 被引量:2
  • 4郭水良,方芳,倪丽萍,陈万林,石来娣.检疫性杂草毒莴苣的光合特征及其入侵地群落学生态调查[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2316-2320. 被引量:11
  • 5Hebert P D N,Cywinska A,Ball S L,et al.Biological identifica-tions through DNA barcodes.Proceedings of the Royal Society ofLondon Series B:Biological Sciences,2003,270:313–321.
  • 6Kress W J,Wurdack K J,Zimmer E A,et al.Use of DNA barcodesto identify flowering plants.Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences,USA,2005,102:8369-8374.
  • 7Newmaster S G,Fazekas A J,Ragupathy S.DNA barcoding in theland plants:evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach.Candian Joural of Botany,2006,84:335-341.
  • 8Blaxter M,Mann J,Chapman T,et al.Defining operational taxo-nomic units using DNA barcode data.Philosophical Transactionsof the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2005,360:1935-1943.
  • 9Rach J,DeSalle R,Sarkar I N,et al.Character-based DNA bar-coding allows discrimination of genera,species and populations inOdonata.Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2008,275:237-247.
  • 10Lahaye R,van der Bank M,Bogarin D,et al.DNA barcoding thefloras of biodiversity hotspots.Proceedings of the National Acade-my of Sciences,USA,2008,105:2923–2928.

共引文献160

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部