期中学生反馈教学咨询服务对改进教学的影响分析被引量：3

The Impact of Midterm Student Feedback Teaching Consultation Service on Teaching Improvement:The Case of Shanghai JiaoTong University

下载PDF

导出

摘要期中学生反馈(midterm student feedback,MSF)教学咨询服务(以下简称MSF服务),是通过第三方(教学咨询员)进行课堂观摩和收集学生反馈以及提供相应的教学咨询来帮助教师发现问题、解决问题的教学支持服务形式。教师基于学生反馈及教学咨询来确定教学调整的方向和方法,并在教学中加以实施,从而改善课堂教学,提高教学水平。MSF服务促进教师教学行为改变的因素有:服务动机契合教师需求、学生积极参与、咨询员注重引导以及教师积极反思四个方面。这一服务对教师教学的改善存在着显性和隐性的影响。 Provided by teaching consultant as third party through classroom observation, student feedback collection and corresponding interview, Midterm Student Feedback Teaching Consultation Service （MSF service） is aimed at helping teachers find out teaching problems and the ways to solve them. Based on the student feedback and teaching consultation service, teachers can figure out solutions to dilemmas and employ them in teaching practice to enhance teaching. The factors facilitating the improvement of teaching behavior include service motivation in conformity with teachers＂ requirement, students＂ positive participation, consultants＂ guidance and teachers＂ positive reflection. MSF service has both visible and invisible impact on teaching.

作者梁竹梅谢艳梅邱意弘

机构地区上海交通大学教学发展中心

出处《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期69-75,共7页 Fudan Education Forum

基金全国教育科学"十三五"规划2016年度教育部重点课题"大学教学学术研究对教师教学行为影响的实证研究"(DIA160329)

关键词期中学生反馈(MSF) 教学咨询服务教学改进 Midterm Student Feedback Teaching Consultation Service Teaching Improvement

分类号 G642.0 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1梁竹梅.期中学生反馈教学咨询服务的发展研究——国外研究与本校探索[J].现代大学教育,2015,31(6):101-106. 被引量：5

二级参考文献17

1Algozzine,B. , et al. Student Evaluation Of College Teach-ing :A Practice In Search Of Principles [ J]. College Teach-ing, 2004, 52(4): 134-141.
2Cohen, P. A. Effectiveness of Student-Rating Feedback forImproving College Instruction : A Meta-Analysis of Findingsf J]. Research in Higher Education, 1980(4):321 -341.
3Germain, M. & T. A. Scandura. Grade Inflation and StudentIndividual Differences as Systematic Bias in Faculty Evalua-tions [J]. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 2005 , 32(1):58-67.
4Harris, G. L. & D. D. Sevens. The Value of MidtermStudent Feedback in Cross-Disciplinary Graduate Programs[J]. Journal of Public Administration Education, 2013, 19(3): 537 -558.
5Keutzer, C. S. Midterm Evaluation of Teaching ProvidesHelpful Feedback to Instructors [ J]. Teaching of Psychol-ogy, 1993,20(4); 238 -240.
6Clark, D. J. & M. V. Redmond. Small Group Instruction-al Diagnosis: Final Report [ R]. The Educational ResourceInformation Center ( ERIC ) Document Reproduction ServiceNo. ED 217954,1982.
7Holt, M. E. & A. B. Moore. Checking Halfway : The Val-ue of Midterm Course Evaluation [ J]. Evaluation Practice,1992, 13(l):47-50.
8Linse, A. R.,et al. Making Assessment Projects Sustain-able: Using Mid-term Class Interviews to Gather StudentFeedback in an International Research and Design Course[C ] . Boston MA :32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference, 2002: 1 -7.
9库克,K;卡普兰,M.提升大学教学能力--教学中心的作用[M].第1版.陈劲,等,译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2011:58 -69.
10Diamond, M. R. The Usefulness of Structured Mid-termFeedback as a Catalyst for Change in Higher EducationClasses [ J] . Active Learning in Higher Education, 2004,5(3) :217 -231.