摘要
李劼人"大河小说"在1937—1977年这40年间几近寂寥的接受命运史中,其"史之意"及"志之趣"的创作特征受到文学批评家及学者的发掘和赞誉,提出李劼人理应迈向经典作家行列的看法。这种说法稍显片面,本文以巴金《激流三部曲》实现经典作品之历程为参照,从二者的历史发展轨迹比对中,形成对李劼人"大河小说"迈向经典作品的一些思考。
For 40 years( 1937 - 1977), a fatal history of almost lonesome acceptance, Li Jieren' s Roman Fleuve, the creative feature of "the meaning of history" and "the interest of novel" was discovered and praised by literary critics and scholars, who proposed that Li Jieren should march towards the ranks of the classic writers. This claim is kind of one-sided. This paper takes Ba Jin "torrent trilogy" as a reference to achieve the classic works of the course, from the historical development of the two track com- parison, forming some reflections on the development of Li Jieren' s Roman Fleuve marching towards the classic works .
出处
《东莞理工学院学报》
2017年第6期39-43,共5页
Journal of Dongguan University of Technology