期刊文献+

乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌与乳腺黏液腺癌分子指标及预后的比较

The molecular typing and prognosis of primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the breast compared with mucinous breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌与乳腺黏液腺癌的分子特点及预后。方法对6例乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌患者和25例乳腺黏液腺癌患者的临床病理资料进行回顾性分析,比较其分子分型特点及生存情况。结果乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌与乳腺黏液腺癌患者在发病年龄、肿瘤大小、TNM分期、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)表达及分子分型方面,差异均无统计学意义(P≥0.05);在淋巴结转移、Ki-67表达方面,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌与乳腺黏液腺癌患者的5年无病生存率分别为66.7%、80.0%。结论乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌比乳腺黏液腺癌更具侵袭性,淋巴结转移率高,Ki-67表达水平高,预后差。 Objective To compare the molecular typing and prognosis of primary signet-ring cell carcinoma(SRCC)of the breast and mucinous breast cancer(MBC). Method The clinical data of 6 patients diagnosed as SRCC and 25 patients diagnosed as MBC were analyzed to compare the molecular typing and prognosis. Result There was no statistically significant differences in age, tumor size, TNM stage, ER, PR, HER2 expression and molecular typing between the two groups(P≥0.05). Patients with SRCC showed more frequent lymphatic metastasis and higher Ki-67 index(P〈0.05). The5-year disease-free survival rates were 66.7% and 80.0% respectively in patients with SRCC and MBC. Conclusion SRCC is more aggressive than MBC, with more frequent lymphatic metastasis, higher Ki-67 index and worse prognosis.
出处 《癌症进展》 2017年第10期1183-1185,共3页 Oncology Progress
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目课题(2014BAI08B03)
关键词 乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌 乳腺黏液腺癌 分子分型 primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the breast mucinous breast cancer molecular typing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献56

  • 1Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for sub types-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [J]. Ann Oncol, 2011,22 (8):1736 -1747.
  • 2The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours [J]. Nature, 2012, 490 (7418) :61- 70.
  • 3Dunbier AK,Anderson H,Ghazoui Z, et al. Association between breast cancer subtypes and response to neoadjuvant anastrozole [J]. Steroids, 2011,76(8) :736-740.
  • 4Ellis M J, Ding L, Shen D, et al. Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition[J]. Nature,2012, 486(7403) :353-360.
  • 5Galimberti V,Botteri E,Chifu C,et al. Can we avoid axillary dis- section in the micrometastatic sentinel node in breast cancer? [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2012,131(3) : 819-825.
  • 6Martelli G,Boracchi P,Ardoino I,et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in older patients with T1N0 breast cancer: 15-year results of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2012,256(6) : 920-924.
  • 7Goldhirsch A,Gelber RD,Piccart-Gebhart MJ,et al. 2 years ver- sus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER-2 positive breast cancer (HERA) :an open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet,2013,382(9897) :1021-1028.
  • 8Pivot X,Romieu G,Debled M,et al. 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumah for patients with HER-2-positive early breast cancer (PHARE):a randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013,14 (8) : 741-748.
  • 9Davies C,Pan H, Godwin J, et al. Long term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial[J]. Lancet,2013,381 (9869) :805-816.
  • 10Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, et al. Ki67 index, HER-2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2009,101(10) :736-750.

共引文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部