期刊文献+

逆行穿刺路径下血管腔内治疗股腘动脉长段闭塞性病变 被引量:3

Endovascular treatment for long segment occlusion of femoral-popliteal artery by using retrograde puncture path
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨逆行穿刺路径下血管腔内治疗股腘动脉长段闭塞性病变的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析2009年6月至2017年1月收治的46例复杂股腘动脉长段闭塞性病变患者临床资料,其中男27例,女19例,平均年龄(69±8)岁;Rutherford分级3级32例,4级8例,5级6例;CTA显示病变平均长度(17±5)cm。结果 46例患者手术技术成功率为100%。小切口显露并穿刺动脉平均用时(5.2±2.3)min,7例使用4 F动脉鞘管,39例无鞘操作;41例导丝顺利通过股腘动脉闭塞段进入近端真腔,5例以顺逆行双向内膜下血管成形术(SAFARI)技术建立导丝工作轨道。术后第3日踝-肱指数(ABI)均值为(0.71±0.12),与术前(0.33±0.11)相比差异有显著统计学意义(t=12.483,P<0.001)。总体手术相关并发症发生率为23.9%(11/46),远端动脉穿刺并发症发生率为4.3%(2/46),围手术期无死亡患者。43例(93.5%)患者获随访3~24个月,术后3、6、12个月CTA复查支架一期通畅率分别为91.3%(4/46)、78.3%(10/46)、58.7%(19/46),1年保肢率为95.7%(44/46)。结论逆行穿刺路径下血管腔内治疗复杂股腘动脉长段闭塞性病变操作简单,安全有效,具有一定的临床应用价值。 Objective To assess the value of endovascular management in treating long segment occlusion of femoral-popliteal artery by using retrograde puncture path. Methods The clinical data of a total of 46 patients with long segment occlusion of femoral-popliteal artery, who were admitted to authors' hospital during the period from June 2009 to January 2017 to receive endovascular treatment, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients included 27 males and 19 females, with a mean age of (69+8) years old. Grade Ⅲ of Rutherford classification was seen in 32 patients, grade IV in 8 patients, and grade V in 6 patients. On CT angiography, the mean length of occluded lesion was (17+5) cm. Results In 46 patients of this series, the technical success rate was 100%. The average time used for making the small skin incision and puncturing the artery was (5.2±2.3) min. A 4-F artery sheath was employed in 7 patients, endovascular management with no use of artery sheath was carried out in 39 patients. The guide wire smoothly passed through the occluded segment of femoral-popliteal artery and entered the proximal true lumen in 41 patients. Subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retregrade intervention (SAFARI) technique was adopted to establish guide wire working track in 5 patients. On the third postoperative day, the ankle brachial index (ABI) was (0.71±0.12), which was significantly different from preoperative (0.33±0.11 ), and the difference was statistically significant (t=12.483, P〈0.001). The overall incidence of operation-related complications was 23.9% (11/46), the incidence of distal arterial puncture-related complications was 4.3%(2/46). No death occurred in perioperative period. Forty-three patients (93.5%) were followed up for 3-24 months. CTA reexamination performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment showed that the primary pateney rate of the stent were 91.3% (4/46), 78.3% (10/46) and 58.7%(19/46) respectively, and the one-year limb salvage rate was 95.7%(44/46). Conclusion For the treatment of long segment occlusion of femoral-popliteal artery, endovascular management by using retrograde puncture path is technically simple and clinically safe and effective, this technique has certain clinical application value.
作者 柴伟 刘汝海 张执全 李凤山 雷豹 袁俊建 孔德帅 CHAI Wei;LIU Ruhai;ZHANG Zhiquan;LI Fengshan;LEI Boo;YUAN Junjian;KONG Deshuai(Department of General Surgery, Cangzhou Municipal Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province 061001, China)
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第12期1078-1082,共5页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
关键词 动脉硬化闭塞症 逆行穿刺技术 介入治疗 arteriosclerosis obliterans retrograde puncture technique interventional therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献51

  • 1颜荣华,肖恩华.下肢动脉闭塞性疾病的血管内介入治疗进展[J].介入放射学杂志,2005,14(2):205-209. 被引量:37
  • 2Bolia A, Brennan J, Bell PR. Recanalization of femoro-popliteal occlusions: improving success by subintimal recanalization. C|in Radiol, 1989,40:325.
  • 3Spinosa DJ, Harthun NL, Bissonette EA, et al. Subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention (SAFARI) for subintimal recanalization to treat chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2005 ,16 :37-44.
  • 4Norgren L,Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease ( TASC II ). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2007,33 Suppl 1 : S1-75.
  • 5Rabellino M, Zander T, Baldi S, et al. Clinical follow-up in endovascular treatment for TASC C-D lesions in femoro-popliteal segment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ,2009,73:701-705.
  • 6Bradbury AW, Adam D J, Bell J, et al. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial : Analysis of amputation free and overall survival by treatment received. J Vasc Surg,2010, 51 Suppl:S18-31.
  • 7Met R, Lienden K, Koelemay M, et al. Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease:a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radio1,2008 ,31:687-697.
  • 8Gandini R, Pipitone V, Stefanini M, et al. The “Safari” technique to perform difficult subintimal infragenicular vessels. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2007,30 : 469 -473.
  • 9Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral artery disease( TASC 11 ). J Vasc Surg,2007,45 Suppl S : S5-67.
  • 10Faglia E, Clerici G, Clerissi J, et al. When is a technically successful peripheral angioplasty effective in preventing above-the- ankle amputation in diabetie patients with critical limb ischaemia? Diabet Med ,2007,24:823-829.

共引文献48

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部