论新自由主义逻辑陷阱、内生极端化与华盛顿共识困境

The Logical Pitfall and Endogenous Extremism of Neoliberalism and the Dilemma of the Washington Consensus

新自由主义理论存在着逻辑陷阱与内生极端化特征。新自由主义逻辑陷阱最核心的表现便是通过教条化与简单化私有制、经济计算与合理经济之间的关系,片面否认社会主义公有制与合理经济之间的相关性。以哈耶克为代表的新自由主义理论家们,通过与兰格等坚持社会主义公有制经济的理论家们的论战,进一步把新自由主义思想教条化、政治化与意识形态化,形成新自由主义内生极端化特征。华盛顿共识作为新自由主义政策主张教条化与极端化的产物,其政策主张突出表现为宏观稳定化、市场化、自由化和私有化,其失效和失败具有必然性。华盛顿共识困境是新自由主义应用于广大发展中国家所导致的必然结果,根本原因在于其逻辑陷阱与内生极端化。

The Neoliberal theory is characterized by logical pitfall and endogenous extremism. The core of its logical pitfall is the rejection of the connection between socialist public ownership and rational economy through a dogmatized and simplified relationship between private ownership,economic calculation and rational economy. Hayek,as the representative of Neoliberal theorists,through his debates with Lange and other economists that supported an economy with socialist public ownership,further dogmatized,politicized and ideologized neoliberal ideas to the extent of the formation of its endogenous extremism. The Washington consensus,as a result of the dogmatized and extreme neoliberal policies,advocate policies of macroeconomic stability,market liberalization and privatization,which are doomed to fail. The dilemma of the Washington consensus is the inevitable result of neoliberal public policies in the developing countries,and the root cause lies in its logical pitfall and endogenous extremism.