期刊文献+

知识属性、技术学习惯例与企业创新绩效:规模的调节效应 被引量:7

Knowledge attribute,technological learning routine and firms' innovation performance:The moderating effect of firm size
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文深入考察了技术学习惯例在知识属性与企业创新绩效之间的中介作用机制。在实证研究中,本文运用大样本问卷调查数据和结构方程模型分析方法对理论假设进行检验。研究发现,技术学习惯例强度在知识属性影响企业创新绩效的机制中起部分中介作用。具体而言,知识存储惯例强度和知识激活惯例强度在知识缄默性与企业创新绩效之间起部分中介作用;知识激活惯例强度在知识异质性与企业创新绩效之间起部分中介作用;企业规模对知识缄默性与知识存储惯例强度、知识激活惯例强度之间的关系起调节作用。 This paper examines deeply how technological learning routine mediates the relationship between knowledge attributes and firms' innovation performance. Based on the survey data and structural equation modeling method,this paper conducts an empirical study to validate the theoretical hypotheses. The results show that the intensity of technological learning routine mediates partially the relationship between knowledge attributes and firms ' innovation performance. Specifically,the intensity of knowledge maintenance routine and that of knowledge reactivation routine mediate the relationship between knowledge tacitness and innovation performance,and the intensity of knowledge reactivation routine mediates the relationship between knowledge heterogeneity and innovation performance. Besides,firm size plays a moderating role on the relationships between knowledge tacitness and the intensity of knowledge maintenance routine and that of knowledge reactivation routine.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第12期29-40,共12页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金(71202129) 起止时间:2013.1-2015.12 国家自然科学基金(71672185) 起止时间:2017.01-2020.12 国家自然科学基金(71402042) 起止时间:2015.1-2017.12 浙江省自然科学基金(LQ14G020013) 起止时间:2014.1-2016.12 浙江省自然科学基金一般项目(LY17G020011) 起止时间:2017.1-2019.12
关键词 知识缄默性 知识异质性 技术学习惯例 企业规模 knowledge tacitness knowledge heterogeneity technological learning routine finn size
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献47

  • 1温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3081
  • 2Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advan- tage [ J ]. Journal of management. 1991, 17 ( 1 ) :99 - 120.
  • 3Ragna Seidler - de, A. , Evi, H. The Use of Tacit Knowl-edge within Innovative Companies: Knowledge Management in Innovative Enterprises [ J ]. Journal of Knowledge Manage- ment. 2008, 12(1) :133 -147.
  • 4Jaffe, A. Real effects of academic research [J]. The Ameri- can Economic Review. 1989, 79 (5) : 957 -970.
  • 5Capello, R. , Faggian, A. Collective Learning and Relationrd Capital in Local Innovation Processes [ J]. Regional Studies. 2005, 39 ( 1 ) : 75 - 87.
  • 6Baptista, R. ,Swann, P. Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More [J]. Research Policy. 1998, 27(5) : 525 -540.
  • 7Morrison, A., Rabellotti, R. Knowledge and Information Networks in an Italian Wine Cluster [J]. European Planning Studies. 2009, 17(7) : 983 - 1006.
  • 8Zander, U. , Kogut, B. Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities : An Em- pirical Test [J]. Organization Science. 1995, 6( 1 ): 76 - 92.
  • 9Guo, B. , Guo, J. Patterns of Technological Learbing within The Knowledge Systems of Industrial Clusters in Emerging E- conomies: Evidence from China [ J ]. Teehnovation. 2011, 31:87 - 104.
  • 10Inkpen, A., Tsang, E. Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer [ J ]. Academy of Management Review. 2005, 30(1) :146 -165.

同被引文献113

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部