助长性人际技能测试中文版的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills Task and Rating Method

目的:检验助长性人际技能(FIS)测试在中国文化背景下作为咨询师人际能力测量工具的信度和效度。方法:由124位被试填写人际反应指针量表和社会技能量表,独立完成FIS测试,由2位评分者对被试在测试中的行为表现独立评分。结果:(1)探索性因素分析表明,FIS测试可抽取2个因子,累积方差贡献率为74.810%;(2)FIS测试8个项目之间及7个任务情境之间的Cronbach’s Alpha系数分别为0.892和0.931,总分的评分者信度ICC为0.952,各项目及各任务情境的ICC在0.767~0.949之间;(3)除希望感外,FIS测试的其它7个项目与总分相关显著;(4)除说服力外,专业组与非专业组被试的FIS测试总分及其它项目得分均差异显著。结论:FIS测试中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用来测量我国咨询师的助长性人际技能。

Objective： To investigate the reliability and validity of Chinese Version of the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills（FIS） Task and Rating Method. Methods： A sample of 124 participants was adopted to accomplish the IRI-C, SSI and FIS performance task in the counseling room by themselves, and two graduate students who are in a program of counseling and clinical psychology rated the recorded responses for each participant. Results： （1） The exploratory factor analysis showed that FIS consisted of two factors, accounting for 74.810% of the total variance. （2）Cronbach＇ s Alpha of 8-items and 7-stimulus clips were 0.892 and 0.931 respectively; The ICCs between two raters were ranging from 0.767 to 0.952 for the 8-items and 7- stimulus clips, and 0.952 for the FIS total score. （3）The scores of 7-items were significantly and positively correlated with the FIS total score except the Hope ＆ Positive Expectation item. （4）The scores of professional group in FIS were significantly higher than nonprofessional group in total as well as 6 of 8 items except the Hope ＆ Positive Expectation and Persuasiveness items. Conclusion： The Chinese Version of the FIS Task and Rating Method is a valid and reliable in- st^ment to assess the therapists＇ facilitative interpersonal skills.