期刊文献+

生产力发展悖论的辩证逻辑抽绎——兼论学界关于生产力认识的误区 被引量:1

On the Dialectical Logic of the Productivity Development Paradox: A Study of the Misunderstanding of Productivity in Academia
原文传递
导出
摘要 很多人认为生态危机的根源是生产力"控制与征服"自然的理念与人类需求的膨胀,这种观点是片面的。"控制与征服"自然和满足人的需求是一切社会形态生产力的"原生态"本质,是人类由必然王国通向自由王国的桥梁。人与自然既"统一"又"斗争"的矛盾存在于一切社会形态,而生产力蕴含在社会劳动中,是调整和控制人与自然物质变换的过程,也是自然不断向人生成的过程。只要抑制生产力过程的熵变,"控制与征服"自然的力度与人类需求的广度不仅不必限制,还可不断扩大,生产力的二律背反同样能消解,并实现人与自然"斗争"中的和解,而马克思提出的"人成为社会主人、自然主人与自身主人,即自由人",最终也才能真正实现。 Many hold that the ecological crisis derives from the concept of"controlling and conquering"nature through productivity and human’s expanding needs However,this perception is biased since"controlling and conquering"nature and meeting human needs are in essence"original ecology"of productivity in any societies as well as the bridge leading human beings from the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom.The"unified"but"conflicting"contradiction between human and nature exists in any societies.However,productivity is included in social labor,adjusting and controlling the physical transformation of human and nature,a transformation from nature to into human.As long as we are able to retain the transfiguration of productivity,we can"control and conquer"nature and human needs,or even let them expand.The antinomy of productivity could be mitigated,the reconciliation between human and nature could be realized,and the Marx’s idea that"Human beings become the master of society,nature,and themselves,namely liberal men"could come true ultimately.
作者 吴江华
出处 《毛泽东邓小平理论研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第11期41-48,共8页 Studies on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theories
基金 国家社科基金十八大以来党中央治国理政新理念新思想新战略研究专项工程项目"十八大以来党中央治国理政的生态文明思想与实践探索研究"[16ZZD006]的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献4

共引文献13

同被引文献22

引证文献1

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部