期刊文献+

论儒墨之争的结构性张力

The Structural Tension of the Dispute between Confucian and Mohism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 儒墨之争是复杂性问题,也是中国文化史上的重大事件。它的发生是由当时的文化状况决定的,既是话语权之争,也是政治道路选择之争。文化史上的儒墨之争产生了四种格局:儒墨互非、儒墨互用、尊儒抑墨和排儒扬墨,这形成了既互相牵制又相对均衡的结构性张力。重思儒墨之争,有益于对墨学不断地探索、发觉和创造性转化,促使儒学和墨学研究获得新的进展,这将给中华传统文化的返本开新创造出许多生机。 The dispute between Confucian and Mohism is not only a complexity problem, but also a major event in the history of China culture. Its occurrence is detennined by the cultural situation at that time. It is a controversy of the discourse power and the choice of the political road. The dispute between Confucian and Mohism on the cuhure history produces four kinds of pattern: mutual negation, mutual use, for Confucian and against Mohism, for Mohism and against Confucian. It forms the structural tension which contains each other and relatively balances. Rethinking the dispute between Confucian and Mohism is beneficial to constantly explore and creative transformation of Mohism. This can prompt the research progress. This can create the new life of the Chinese traditional culture.
作者 黄庆丽
机构地区 青岛大学
出处 《职大学报》 2017年第6期17-22,共6页 Journal of the Staff and Worker’s University
关键词 儒墨之争 儒墨互非 儒墨互用 尊儒抑墨 排儒扬墨 the dispute between Confucian and Mohism mutual negation mutual use for Corrfucian and against Mohism for Mohism and against Confucian.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1刘家和.《左传》中的人本思想与民本思想[J].历史研究,1995(6):3-13. 被引量:26
  • 2王国维.书辜氏汤生英译《中庸》后[M].姚淦铭,王燕.王国维文集:第3卷.北京:中国文史出版社,1997.
  • 3[美]倪德卫.儒家之道:中国哲学之探讨[M].周炽成,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2006.
  • 4杨希枚.《孟子·滕文公》篇三年丧故事的分析[M].先秦文化史论集.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995.
  • 5王桐龄.儒墨之异同[M].上海:上海书店,据北平文化学社1931年版影印.
  • 6清·俞正燮.癸已类稿卷十四.墨学论[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.2001.480.
  • 7唐·陆淳.春秋集传·篡例卷一,三传得失议引[M].影印文渊阁《四库全书》本.
  • 8唐·韩愈.昌黎先生文集卷十一[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985.
  • 9侯外庐等.中国思想通史第五卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1957.
  • 10毛泽东.毛泽东书信选集[C].北京:中央文献出版社,2003.140-142.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部