期刊文献+

谷赖胰岛素联合甘精胰岛素治疗口服降糖药物继发性失效的2型糖尿病的临床研究 被引量:33

Clinical trial of insulin glulisine combined with insulin glargine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients with secondary failure to oral hypoglycemia agents
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较谷赖胰岛素(GLU)或门冬胰岛素(ASP)联合甘精胰岛素(GLA)治疗口服降糖药物继发性失效的2型糖尿病(T2DM)的临床疗效及安全性。方法将120例口服降糖药物继发性失效的T2DM随机分为对照组60例和试验组60例。对照组予以皮下注射ASP,起始剂量0.8 U·kg^(-1)·d^(-1),每日三餐前0~10 min+皮下注射GLA,起始剂量0.2 U·kg^(-1)·d^(-1),qd;试验组予以皮下注射GLU,起始剂量0.8 U·kg^(-1)·d^(-1),每日三餐前0~10 min+皮下注射GLA,起始剂量0.2 U·kg^(-1)·d^(-1),qd。2组患者均治疗12周,其中前2周住院治疗。比较2组患者治疗2周后的血糖达标例数和时间天数,治疗12周后的糖化血红蛋白(Hb A1c)变化,以及药物不良反应的发生情况。结果试验组和对照组三餐的餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)均同时达标所需时间天数分别为(10.01±1.99)d和(10.93±1.52)d,例数分别为54和47例,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。试验组和对照组空腹血糖、中晚餐的餐前血糖与三餐的2 h PG均同时达标所需时间天数分别为(10.31±1.04)d和(11.03±1.38)d,例数分别为48和40例,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。治疗12周后,试验组和对照组Hb A1c分别为(6.78±0.59)%和(7.07±0.49)%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者的药物不良反应以低血糖事件为主,试验组和对照组的低血糖事件发生率分别为30.00%和25.00%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 GLU联合GLA治疗口服降糖药物继发性失效的T2DM的临床疗效和安全性与ASP联合GLA相似,但前者控制餐后血糖明显优于后者。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine( GLU) and insulin aspart( ASP) combined with insulin glargine( GLA) in type 2 diabetes patients( T2DM) with secondary failure to oral hypoglycemic agents. Methods One hundred and twenty cases of T2 DM with secondary failure to oral hypoglycemia agents were randomly divided into control group( n = 60 cases) and treatment group( n = 60 cases). The control group received subcutaneous injection of ASP before 0-10 min three meals daily, and the treatment group received subcutaneous injection of GLU before 0-10 min three meals daily. The two groups were treated with subcutaneous injection of GLA,once daily. The initial dose of ASP and GLU were 0. 8 U·kg-1·d-1,and the initial dose of GLA was 0. 2 U · kg-1·d-1. Two groups ofpatients were hospitalized for 2 weeks. The changes of blood glucose,cases and days of blood glucose of achieving target were compared after treatment of hospitalization. The improvement of Hb A1 c and the frequency of hypoglycemia were observed after treatment of 12 weeks. Results The days of 2-hour postprandial blood glucose( 2 h PG) of achieving target in the treatment group and the control group were( 10. 01 ± 1. 99) d and( 10. 93 ± 1. 52) d with 57 cases and 47 cases,and the days of fasting plasma glucose,postprandial blood glucose and 2 h PG of achieving target were( 10. 31 ± 1. 04) d and( 11. 03 ± 1. 38) d with 48 cases and 40 cases( all P〈0. 05). After treatment 12 weeks,the HbA1c in treatment and control groups were( 6. 78 ± 0. 59) % and( 7. 07 ± 0. 49) % without significant difference( P〈0. 05). During treatment of 12 weeks,the adverse drug reactions in the two groups were mainly hypoglycemic events,the incidence of hypoglycemia in the treatment group was 30. 00%,and 25. 00% in the control group,the difference was not statistically significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Both GLU combined with GLA or ASP combined with GLA have similar efficacy and safety for T2 DM with secondary failure to oral hypoglycemic agents. GLU combined with GLA is more rapid in controlling 2 h PG of these patients.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第23期2361-2363,2386,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
关键词 谷赖胰岛素 门冬胰岛素 2型糖尿病 口服降糖药物继发性失效 insulin glulisine insulin aspart type 2 diabetes mellitus secondary failure to oral hypoglycemia agent
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Becker RH,Frick AD,Nosek L. Dose-response relationship of insulin glulisine in subjects with type 1 diabetes[J].Diabetes Care,2007.2506-2507.
  • 2Rayman G,Profozic V,Middle M. Insulin glulisine imparts effective glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes[J].Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,2007,(2):304-312.doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.006.
  • 3Chao M,Wang W,Zhang Y. Bioequivalence between two human insulin analogs in Chinese population:Glulisine and Lispro[J].Endocrinology,2010.48-52.
  • 4Holleman F,Hoekstra JB. Insulin lispro[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1997.176-183.
  • 5Dreyer M,Prager R,Robinson A. Efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine in patients with type 1 diabetes[J].Hormone and Metabolic Research,2005.702-707.doi:10.1055/s-2005-870584.
  • 6Kawamori R,Kadowaki T,Ishii H. Efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus[J].Diabetes,Obesity and Metabolism,2009.891-899.
  • 7Becker RH. Insulin glulisine complementing basal insulins:a review of structure and activity[J].Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics,2007.109-121.
  • 8Heise T,Nosek L,Spitzer H. Insulin glulisine:a faster onset of action compared with insulin lispro[J].Diabetes,Obesity and Metabolism,2007.746-753.
  • 9Luzio S,Peter R,Dunseath GJ. A comparison of preprandial insulin glulisine versus insulin lispro in people with Type 2 diabetes over a 12-h period[J].Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,2008.269-275.doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2007.11.013.
  • 10Garg SK,Rosenstock J,Ways K. Optimized Basal-bolus insulin regimens in type 1 diabetes:insulin glulisine versus regular human insulin in combination with Basal insulin glargine[J].Endocrine Practice,2005.11-17.

共引文献12

同被引文献272

引证文献33

二级引证文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部