期刊文献+

两种疝修补片在无张力修补术中的疗效比较

Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Types of Herniorrhaphy in Tension Free Repair
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨软质补片和硬质补片用于无张力疝修补术的临床效果。方法以2012年3月—2017年3月我院160例行无张力疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者为研究对象,依据使用补片不同分为实验组(硬质疝修补片,80例)和对照组(软质疝修补片,80例),观察两组疗效。结果实验组手术时间(44.3±3.7)min、并发症发生率(17.50%)与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论软质补片和硬质补片用于无张力疝修补术均安全可行,其中前者手术时间较长,后者会增加腹股沟区不适感,临床应用需酌情选择。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of soft patch and hard patch for tension-free herniorrhaphy. Methods From March 2012 to March 2017, 160 cases of inguinal hernia repaired by tension free herniorrhaphy in our hospital were studied. The effect of the two groups was observed in the two groups according to the use of the patch, which were divided into the experimental group (hard herniorrhaphy, 80 cases) and the control group (80 cases of soft hernia repair). Results In the experimental group, the operation time was (44.3±3.7) min and the incidence of complications was (17.50%), compared with the control group, there was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Soft patch and rigid patch are safe and feasible for tension-free herniorrhaphy. The former has longer operation time and the latter will increase the discomfort of inguinal region. The clinical application should be chosen as appropriate.
作者 曹晓刚
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第30期70-71,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 无张力疝修补术 硬质补片 软质补片 临床疗效 tension-free herniorrhaphy hard patch soft patch clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

共引文献242

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部