期刊文献+

TKI治疗慢性髓系白血病的疗效及获得深层分子反应的相关影响因素分析 被引量:2

Analysis of Efficacy and Related Factors of Acquired Deep Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with TKI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗慢性髓系白血病(CML)的疗效,探讨获得深层分子反应(DMR)的影响因素。方法:对我院接受TKI治疗的131例成人CML患者的临床资料及随访结果进行了分析,评价各时间点治疗反应的疗效,分析影响获得MR^(4.5)的相关因素。结果:131例患者中位随访24(6-120)个月,其中30例在中位伊马替尼治疗12(1-69.6)个月换为尼洛替尼治疗,13例在中位伊马替尼治疗31.2(3.1-87.6)个月时换达沙替尼。治疗3、6及12个月的获得主要细胞遗传学反应(MCyR)率分别为78%、79.4%及95.9%,获得完全细胞遗传学反应(CCyR)率分别为48.8%、66.7%及73.5%。60%的患者3个月时BCR-ABL^(IS)<10%,6个月BCR-ABL^(IS)<1%占56.3%,12个月BCR-ABL^(IS)<0.1%达55.2%。持续伊马替尼治疗组中53例(60.9%)获得MR^(4.5),31例(35.6%)能够获得稳定的MR^(4.5)。多因素分析显示,性别、诊断时WBC计数及3个月BCR-ABL^(IS)水平是获得MR^(4.5)的独立影响因素,3个月BCR-ABL^(IS)水平是获得稳定MR^(4.5)的独立影响因素。换第二代TKI组中18例(40.9%)获得MR^(4.5),3个月BCR-ABL^(IS)水平同样是获得MR^(4.5)的独立影响因素。结论:伊马替尼治疗新诊断CML患者获得细胞遗传学与分子学疗效优异,对于耐药或不能耐受患者换为第二代TKI同样能够获得满意的疗效且DMR率更高,获得早期分子反应预测MR^(4.5)和稳定的MR^(4.5)的累积发生率更高。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and related factors of acquired deep molecular response( DMR) for treating patients with chronic myeloid leukemia( CML) by using TKI. Methods: The clinical data of 131 TKI-treated patients with CML were analyzed retrospectively. The therapeutic effects of each time-points were evaluated,and the related factors of MR^4.5 were analyzed. Results: The median follow up-time of 131 cases with CML was 24 months( 6-120 months),among them the treatment of 30 patient was converted to nilotinib after a median of 12 months( 1-69. 6 months) with imatinib,and 13 patient was converted to dasatinib treatment after a median of 31. 2 month( 3.1-87. 6 months) with imatinib. After treatment for 3,6 and 12 month,the rate of major cytogenetic response( MCyR) was 78%,79. 4% and 95. 9%,and the complete cytogenetic response( CCyR) rate was 48. 8%,66. 7% and 73. 5%, respectively. 60% patients obtained BCR-ABL^IS 〈10% at 3 months,56. 3% patients obtained BCRABL^IS 〈1% at 6 months,55. 2% patients obtained BCR-ABL^IS〈 0. 1% at 12 months. In continued imatinib therapy group,53 patients( 60. 9%) obtained MR^4.5,and 33 cases( 37. 9%) obtained stable MR^4.5. Multivariate analysis showed that sex,WBC count at the time of diagnosis and BCR-ABL^IS level at 3 months were independent factors for obtaining MR^4.5.The 3-month BCR-ABL^IS level was an independent factor to obtain stable MR^4.5. 18 cases( 40. 9%) in the second-generation TKI group received MR^4.5 and the 3-month BCR-ABL^IS level was also an independent predictor for MR^4.5. Conclusion:The excellent cytogenetic and molecular responses are observed in CML patients treated with cmatinib. Conversion to secondgeneration TKI therapy for patients with resistant or intolerant to imatinib also can achieve a satisfactory responseand a higher rate of deeper molecular remission. The higher incidence of early molecular response predicting MR^4.5 and stable MR^4.5 is achieved.
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期1597-1604,共8页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
关键词 慢性髓系白血病 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 深层分子学反应 chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors deep molecular response
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献34

  • 1Gambacorti- Passerini C, Antolini L, Mahon FX, et al. Multi?center independent assessment of outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib[J].J Natl Cancer Inst, 20 II, I 03 (7) :553-561.
  • 2CortesJE, Baccarani M, Guilhot F, et al. Phase III, randomized, open-label study of daily imatinib mesylate 400 mg versus 800 mg in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase using molecular end points: tyrosine kinase inhibitor optimization and selectivity studyJ J].J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(3 ):424-430.
  • 3CortesJE,Jones D, O'Brien S, et al. Nilotinib as front-line treat?ment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chron?ic phaselJ],J Clin Oncol,2010,28 (3 ):392-397.
  • 4Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia[J]. N EnglJ Med,201 0,362(24) :2251-2259.
  • 5CortesJE,Jones D, O'Brien S, et al. Results of dasatinib therapy in patients with early chronic- phase chronic myeloid leukemia[lJ.J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(3 ):398-404.
  • 6Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, et al. Dasatinib versus ima?tinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leuke?mia] J]. N EnglJ Med, 2010, 362(24):2260-2270.
  • 7CortesJ, Hochhaus A, Hughes T, et al. Front-line and salvage therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other treatments in chronic myeloid leukemia[lJ.J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29 (5): 524-531.
  • 8Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, et al. European Leukemi?aNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013[J]. Blood, 2013,122(6):872-884.
  • 9Hehlmann R, Lauseker M,Jung- Munkwitz S, et al. Tolerability?adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-a in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia[lJ.J Clin Oneal, 2011, 29(12):1634-1642.
  • 10Marin D, Milojkovic D, Olavarria E, et al. European LeukemiaN?et criteria for failure or suboptimal response reliably identify pa- tients with CML in early chronic phase treated with imatinib whose eventual outcome is poor[J]. Blood, 2008, 112 (12): 4437-4444.

共引文献1

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部