记录人作为伪证罪主体合理性之辩护——兼从案卷笔录中心主义进行检视

Defending for Rationality of Taking Recorders as the Subject of Perjury Offense——And Review from the Trial Mode Centralized on the Files and Notes

记录人属于司法机关工作人员,而不是司法工作人员。记录行为的职务性质并不能成为否定记录人是伪证罪主体的根据。无论是从记录人与鉴定人、翻译人的类比论证来看,还是从我国案卷笔录中心主义的司法运作模式需要来看,记录人都应当成为伪证罪主体。只要我国刑事司法运作模式不发生脱胎换骨式的变革,记录人作为伪证罪主体就具有现实合理性。

Recorders belong to staff of the judicial organ but not judicial personnels. The position property of the recorder sconduct doesn＇t become the reason for denyinga recorder＇s being the subject of perjury offense. Recorders should be the subjectof perjury offense whether thinking from analogical verification between recorders and judicial experts or translators or fromajudicial operation mode centralized on the files and notes.As long as the operation mode of the criminal procedure in our countrydoesn爷t change thoroughly, it is rational to take recorders asa perjury the subject of perjury offense.