摘要
2015年《行政诉讼法》的修订,使得行政机关法定代表人出庭应诉的改革措施进入大众的眼帘,加之最高人民法院在对行政诉讼审判机制改革上对该项制度的重视,越来越多的地方颁布规范性文件要求行政机关法定代表人出庭应诉,因而在实践中所积累形成的经验,促使理论界对该项制度的探讨层出不穷,基于此背景,笔者从行政机关法定代表人出庭应诉的现实意义出发,通过发现该制度立法上、理论上及司法实践经验上的不足,对比分析域外行政机关法定代表人出庭应诉现状,从中吸取利于我国国情的精华,进而针对我国的制度现状提出在立法技术层面、相关配套措施的完善以及法律责任的规定及落实上的针对性建议。
With the revision of Administrative Procedure Law in 2015 and the reform of administrative litigation trial system, theSupreme People爷s Court Pay attention to the appearance of administration legal representative in the court. Making this reformmeasure into the public eye, and Promoting more and more places published local documents, aiming to require administrationlegal representative to appear in court. Therefore, the experience formed in practice urges theorists to explore the system. Basedon this background, the author starts from the realistic meaning of this system. Through finding the system爷s inadequate fromlegislation, theory and practical experience, and Comparing the current situation from foreign administration legal representativeabout the problem of appearing in Court. While taking advantage of it and according to our country's current situation, thisarticle aim to give some advice, including to the aspects of legislation, Supplementary measures and legal liability ,to Improvethis system.
作者
陈欢欢
Chen Huan-huan(Law School Guangxi University,Nanning 530004 Chin)
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2017年第6期95-99,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
行政机关
法定代表人
出庭
诉讼
administration曰 legal representative曰 appear in court曰 litigation