3Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, et al. Extra- corporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) versus per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) or retrograde in- trarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones [J]. Co- chrane Database Syst Rev, 2009, 4 :CD007044.
4Preminger G M. Management of lower pole renal cal- culi., shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy [ J ]. Urol Res, 2006, 34:108-111.
5Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu E B, et al. The impactof pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones[J]. Urology, 2012, 79:61-66.
6Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al. Durability of flexib!.e ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study[J].J Urol, 2006, 76..137-141.
7Michel M S, Trojan L, Rassweiler J J. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].Eur Urol, 2007, 51:899-906.
8Desai M R, Sharma R, Mishra S, et al. Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) the initial clinical report[J]. J Urol, 2011, 186 : 140-145.
9Armagan A, Tepeler A, Silay M S, et al. Micro per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moder- ate size renal calculi [J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26. [Epub ahead of print].
10Tepeler A, Armagan A, Saneaktutar A A, et al. The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi[J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27 (1):13-8.
