期刊文献+

碳排放权交易对高耗能行业淘汰落后产能的影响

Impacts of ETS on Elimination of Backward Production Capacity in Energy-intensive Industries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对中国高耗能行业的碳排放权交易(碳市场)进行了量化评估。通过建立一个两国三商品的局部均衡模型以及综合运用基于技术的微观层面的减排成本曲线,区分了非落后产能和落后产能的技术集合,获得了碳排放权交易对于高耗能行业的影响。模拟结果显示,在配额免费分配("祖父制")的碳市场中,可能会造成非落后产能和落后产能的扭曲效应。通过比较部分拍卖的碳市场和基于产出的配额返还的碳市场,建议在中国的碳市场中使用灵活的基于产出的配额分配方式,以更好的达到促进落后产能淘汰、促进节能技术升级的政策目标。 Large energy conservation potential and outdated capacity are two main features of energy intensive sectors in developing countries. Such countries also seek to implement market-based options to further control domestic CO2 emissions, as well as to promote outdated capacity withdrawal and production level upgrading. This paper presented a quantitative assessment of the emission trading scheme (ETS) on China's energy intensive industry. The diversities of normal and outdated capacities were modeled after the two-countries, three-goods partial equilibrium model. The energy saving benefits was captured through adoption of technology-based, micro- level marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves. Simulation results showed that the abatement potential would be underestimated if the energy saving benefits was not considered. In scenario analysis, we demonstrated that under given situations (e.g. quotas free allocation) a potential competitiveness distortion appeared among domestic normal and outdated capacities after the implementation of ETS. At last, by comparing the impact of free allocation mixed with auction and output-based allocation, a flexible output-based allocation approach is strongly suggested in China's energy intensive sectors, which could achieve the goal of promoting the elimination of outdated production capacity and promoting the upgrading of energy-saving technologies.
作者 李远 朱磊
出处 《石油石化绿色低碳》 2017年第6期6-15,共10页 Green Petroleum & Petrochemicals
关键词 碳排放权交易 高耗能行业 落后产能 配额分配 碳减排 emission trading scheme energy-intensive industry outdated production capacity quota allocation CO2 emission reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1戴星翼.走向绿色的发展[M].复旦大学出版社,1988..
  • 2[美]泰坦伯格著 崔卫国等译.初始排污权交易--污染控制政策的改革[M].北京三联书店出版社,1992..
  • 3中国统计局.中国能源统计年鉴1991~1996 [M].北京:中国统计出版社,1998..
  • 4何建坤 陈文颖 张阿玲 等.气候变化问题上的平等权利准则及限控温室气体排放对中国宏观经济的影响研究[R]..九五国家重点科技攻关专题技术总结报告96—911-03—01[C].北京:清华大学,1999..
  • 5Hamilton D L, Goldstein A G, Lee J, et al.MARKAL-MACRO: An Overview [R]. BNL Report 483777, 1992.
  • 6IEA (International Energy Agency). Key World Energy Statistics from the IEA (2002) [R]. Paris: IEA, 2002.
  • 7Ellerman A D,Buchner B K. Over-allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005-06 emissions data[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2008,(02):267-287.doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9191-2.
  • 8Schleich J,Ehrhartc K M,Hoppec C. Banning banking in EU emissions trading[J].Energy Policy,2006,(01):112-120.doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.009.
  • 9Roberts M J,Spence M. Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty[J].Journal of Public Economics,1976,(3-4):193-208.
  • 10Pizer W A. Combining price and quantity control to mitigate global climate change[J].Journal of Public Economics,2002,(03):409-434.

共引文献189

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部