期刊文献+

2016年骨科医保按病种分组付费(DRGs)亏损病种分组统计分析 被引量:3

Statistical Analysis of Expense Loss Groups in the Department of Orthopedics based on(DRGs) in 2016
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析2014年-2016年北京市某三甲医院骨科按病种分组付费亏损病种分组的费用情况,探讨住院费用控制对策。方法对某医院2014年-2016年骨科按病种分组付费亏损病种分组病例进行人次及费用统计分析。使用描述统计法,用Excel表格形式汇总全部病例费用信息,通过病例数量的变化、亏损费用的逐年变动、费用结构中异常变化项目,作为分析亏损原因的数据支持。结果 2014年-2016年骨科亏损病例数大幅增加由146份上升至260份,例均亏损幅度加大,2016年例均亏损14 733元,同时三年间平均耗材占比由71%上涨到84%。结论骨科收治病种发生变化,因耗材使用量逐年增加导致医疗费用上涨。 Objective To analyze the cost of DRGs in a department of orthopedics of a three grade hospital in Beijing during 2014 and 2016, and to discuss the cost control measures. Methods A case study was conducted in a department of orthopedics from 2014 to 2016. The number of cases and the expenses were analyzed statistically.Descriptive statistics method is used to collect all case cost information in Excel form. Through the change of the number of cases, the annual change of the loss expense, the abnormal changes in the cost structure, as the data support for the analysis of the cause of the loss. Results The number of deficit cases in Department of orthopedics increased from 146 to 260 copies from2014 to 2016. The average loss was increased. 2016 years of losses were 14733 yuan. At the same time, the average consumables ratio increased from 71% to 84% in three years.Conclusion The diseases in Department of orthopedics were changed, and the consumption of consumables increased year by year, leading to the rise of medical expenses.
作者 张晨 焦卫平 郭娜 Zhang Chen;Jiao Weiping;Guo Na(Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China)
出处 《中国病案》 2017年第12期88-90,共3页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 按病种分组付费 费用亏损 耗材使用 Payment by DRGs Expense loss Consumables use
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1黄慧英.诊断相关分类法在北京地区医院管理中的可行性研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,1994,10(3):131-136. 被引量:101
  • 2胡向阳,王原,张修梅.病例组合概念及其应用[J].中华医院管理杂志,1994,10(12):736-739. 被引量:36
  • 3朱士俊,鲍玉荣.医疗费用支付方式改革—DRGs简介[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(10):664-665. 被引量:92
  • 4简伟研,胡牧,崔涛,王洪源,黄因敏,张修梅.运用疾病诊断相关组进行临床服务绩效评价初探[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(11):736-739. 被引量:90
  • 5Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes[M]. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 2003.
  • 6Francis HRF. Case mix use in 25 countries:a migration success but international comparisons failure[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2003, 70: 215-219.
  • 7Bala MV,Zarkin GA. Application of cost effectiveness analysis to multiple products: a practical guide[J]. Am J Manag Care, 2002, 8(3): 211 218.
  • 8Kattcy E. Two decades of casemix. Department of Health and Ageing[EB/OL]. [2011-09-14]. http://www. health. gov. au/ int ernet/main/publishing. nsf/Content.
  • 9Jian WY,Lu M, Cui T, et al. Evaluating performance of local case-mix system by international comparison: a case study in Beijing,China[J]. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2011, 26(4): 471-481.
  • 10Jian WY,Chan KY, Tang SN, et al. A case study of the coun terpart technical support policy to improve rural health services in Beijing. BMC Health Services Research 2012, 12[EB/OL]. [2012]. http://www. biomedcentral. com/content/pdf/1472-6963-12-482. pdf.

共引文献235

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部