期刊文献+

体外冲击波治疗肩部钙化性肌腱炎疗效的Meta分析 被引量:15

Meta Analysis of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Shoulder Calcific Tendinitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过系统地评价临床随机对照实验,探求体外冲击波治疗肩部钙化性肌腱炎的最佳强度和剂量。方法:通过检索The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,EMBASE,Medline和SCI数据库,获得有关比较不同的强度和剂量的体外冲击波治疗肩部钙化性肌腱炎的临床随机对照实验(RCT)。分别独立应用纳入和排除标准评价检索到的文献,提取数据并评价每一纳入文献的方法学上的质量。将纳入研究的文献用Rev Man5.3进行分析。结果:8个比较高、低强度的体外冲击波疗效的临床随机实验(492人)显示,高强度的体外冲击波疗效显著好于低强度体外冲击波,合并后的RR=1.93,95%CI=1.44~2.59;6个比较高、低体外冲击波治疗剂量的临床随机实验(349人)显示,高剂量的体外冲击波疗效显著好于低剂量体外冲击波,合并的RR=1.71,95%CI=1.17~2.50.结论:体外冲击波在治疗肩部钙化性肌腱炎时强度在0.20~0.45 m J/m^2,治疗剂量在600~1 920 m J/m^2时疗效较好。 Objective:To explore the best intensity and dose of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for shoulder calcific tendonitis through the system evaluation of randomized controlled trials. Methods:By retrieving The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,EMBASE, Medline and SCI databases, the clinical randomized controlled trials(RCT)articles about different intensity and dose of extracorporeal shock wave treating shoulder calcific tendinitis were collected. The articles were evaluated separately using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data were extracted and the methodological quality of each included literature was evaluated. The literature included in the study was analyzed by Rev ManS. 3. Results:Eight randomized clinical trials (492 patients) comparing the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave with different intensity showed that high intensity extracorporeal shock wave was significantly better than low intensity extracorporeal shock wave, with combined RR= 1.93 and combined 95 %CI= 1.44-2.59. Six randomized clinical trials (349 patients) comparing the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave with different dose showed that the high dose extracorporeal shock wave was significantly better than the low dose extracorporeal shock wave, with combined RR = 1. 71 and combined 95%CI= 1.17-2.50. Conclusion.. Extracorporeal shock wave has a better effect in the treatment of shoulder calcifying tendinitis when the intensity is 0.20-0.45 mJ/m2 and the dose is 600-1 920 mJ/m2.
作者 石洋 曾瑞瑞
出处 《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 CAS 2017年第12期26-30,共5页 Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
关键词 钙化性肌腱炎 体外冲击波疗法 肩关节 META分析 calcific tendonitis extracorporeal shock wave therapy shoulder Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1邢更彦,井茹芳,杨传铎.体外冲击波治疗网球肘、肩周炎及跟痛症的作用探讨[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2001,10(22):30-31. 被引量:19
  • 2李培芳,金方勤.液中放电冲击波和等离子体参数的计算[J].浙江大学学报(自然科学版),1994,28(1):27-35. 被引量:9
  • 3马振国.等离子体工业的崛起与发展[J].科技导报,1995,13(2):14-17. 被引量:9
  • 4Felson D. Bias in meta-analytic research [J]. J Clin Epidemiol,1992, 45:885 - 892
  • 5Leizorovicz A, Haugh M C, Chapuis F R, et al. Low molecular weight heparin in prevention of perioperative thrombosis [J] .BMJ, 1992, 305:913 - 920
  • 6Nurmohamed M T, Rosendaal F R, Bueller H R. Low-molecularweight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis [J]. Lancet, 1992, 340:162 - 156
  • 7Egger M, Smith D G. Meta-analysis: Bias in location and selection of studies [J]. BMJ, 1998, 316:61 - 66
  • 8Easterbrook P J, Berlin J A, Gopalan R, et al. Publication bias in clinical reaserch [J]. Lancet, 1991, 337:867 - 872
  • 9Simes J R. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of trials [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1986, 1529 - 1541
  • 10Light R J, Pillemer D B. Quantitative procedures. In Summing up:The Science of Reviewing Research [M]. Cambridy, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984

共引文献201

同被引文献101

引证文献15

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部