期刊文献+

新结构经济学、自生能力与新的理论见解 被引量:98

New Structural Economics,Viability and New Theoretical Insights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新结构经济学采用新古典经济学的分析方法来研究现代经济增长的本质及其决定因素。其核心思想是:一个经济体在每个时点上的产业和技术结构内生于该经济体在该时点给定的要素禀赋结构,与产业、技术相适应的软硬基础设施也因此内生决定于该时点的要素禀赋结构。企业的自生能力则是新结构经济学的微观分析基础。在新结构经济学看来,遵循比较优势是经济快速发展的药方,其制度前提是有效的市场和有为的政府。当政府发挥有为作用时,产业政策是个有用的工具。新结构经济学将结构引入新古典的分析框架中,会对主流的新古典经济学产生许多新的见解。新结构经济学希望能够在反思发展经济学自成立以来涌现的结构主义和新自由主义两波思潮的基础上,推动建立发展经济学新的理论框架。 New Structural Economics adopts analytic methods of Neoclassical Economics to study the nature of modern economic growth and its determinants. The core idea is: at each time, the structure of industry and technology in an economy is endogenous within the given structure of factor endowments, and soft & hard infrastructure adapting to the industry and technology is therefore endogenously determined by the structure of factor endowments. The enterprises viability is the micro-basis of New Structural Economics. In the view of New Structural Economics, following the comparative advantage is the prescription of rapid economic development. The institutional premise of the prescription is the effective market and the facilitating state. Industrial policy is a useful tool when the state plays a facilitating role in economic development. New Structural Economics brings the structure into Neoclassical Economics theoretical framework, and produces many new insights to the mainstream Neoclassical Economics. New Structural Economics works on promoting a new theoretical framework of Development Economics on the basis of rethinking the two trends of thoughts (namely, Structuralism and Neoliberalism) since the establishment of Development Economics.
作者 林毅夫 Lin Justin(Peking Universit)
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期5-15,共11页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 新结构经济学 自生能力 新的理论见解 产业政策 new structural economics viability new theoretical insights industrial policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献70

  • 1Ozawa, Terutomo, 2006, "Asia's Labor-driven Economic Development, Flying-Geese Style. " UNU-WIDER research paper, NO. 2006/59.
  • 2Petersen, M. A. and R. G. Rajan, 1994, "The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data", Journal ofFinance, 49: 3--37.
  • 3Petersen, M.A., and R.G. Rajan, 1995, "The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationship", Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, CX: 407--43.
  • 4Petersen, M. A., 2004, "Information: Hard and Soft", working paper.
  • 5Peek, J. and Rosengren, E.S., 1998, "Bank Consolidation and Small Business Lending: It's Not Just Bank Size that Matters", Journal of Banking and Finance, 22: 799--819.
  • 6Rajan, R. G., 1992, "Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice Between Informed and Arms Length Debt", Journal of Finance, 47: 1367-- 1400.
  • 7Rajan, R. G. and L. Zingales, 2003, "The Great Reversals: the Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century," Journal of Financial Economics, 69 : 5--50.
  • 8Scharfstein, D., 1988, "The Disciplinary Role of Takeovers", Review of Economic Studies, 55:185--199.
  • 9Shaw, A.S., 1973, Financial Deepening in Economic Development, New York : Oxford University Press.
  • 10Schere, F.M., 1971, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

共引文献1790

同被引文献1377

二级引证文献515

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部