期刊文献+

培美曲赛联合奈达铂对一线化疗失败的晚期尿路上皮癌的有效性及安全性分析 被引量:5

The efficacy and safety of pemetrexed and nedaplatin in salvage chemotherapy of advanced urinary carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价培美曲赛联合奈达铂治疗一线GC方案治疗失败的局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者的疗效和不良反应。 方法回顾性分析2015年9月至2017年3月收治的一线GC方案治疗后复发或进展的11例局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者的临床资料。男6例,女5例;年龄56~80岁,中位年龄65岁;6例起源于膀胱,4例起源于肾盂,1例起源于输尿管;ECOG评分0分7例,1分3例,2分1例。肺转移6例,肝转移2例,骨转移2例,淋巴结转移6例,多处转移7例。行培美曲赛二钠500 mg/m2,静脉滴注30 min,第1天;奈达铂25 mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1~3天,21 d为1个周期,2~3个周期后评价疗效和不良反应。 结果11例患者行1~6个周期化疗,平均3.3个周期。11例中完全缓解2例(18.2%),部分缓解5例(45.5%),疾病稳定2例(18.2%),疾病进展2例(18.2%),总有效率63.6%(7/11)。主要不良反应为贫血(6例)、白细胞下降(5例)、恶心呕吐(6例)和皮疹(5例),均为1~3级。无治疗相关性死亡病例。 结论培美曲赛联合奈达铂方案治疗晚期尿路上皮癌的疗效肯定,不良反应较轻,可作为一线治疗失败后的可选择的方案。 ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed and nedaplatin in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cell carcinoma who failed a first-line GC regimen. MethodsA total of 11 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma failed with first-line treatment of GC regimen were included in the present study. There were 6 males and 5 females, aged 56-80 years old, median age was 65 years old. Six patients′ primary tumors were in bladder, 4 in the renal pelvis, 1 ureter. There were 7 cases with ECOG score 0 point, 3 cases 1 point, 1 case 2 points. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenously on the 1st day, and nedaplatin 25mg/m2 from the 1st to 3th day every 21 days. The evaluation of efficacy and adverse reactions were carried out after 2 to 3 cycles. ResultsEleven patients received 1 to 6 cycles (mean 3.3 cycles) treatments. There were 2 cases (18.2%) complete remission, 5 cases (45.5%) partial remission, 2 cases (18.2%) no change and 2 cases (18.2%) progressed. The total effective rate was 63.6%. The main adverse events were anemia (6 cases), leukopenia (5 cases), nausea and vomiting (6 cases) and rash (5 cases) , all of which were mild to moderate. No treatment-related death occurred. ConclusionsPemetrexed and nedaplatin regimen could be effective in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma after first-line chemotherapy failed. The side effect is mild.
作者 臧立 霍彬 王磊 霍小东 曹强 王丽丽 王金焕 侯定坤 汪浩 王海涛 Zang Li;Huo Bin;Wang Lei;Huo Xiaodong;Cao Qiang;Wang Lili;Wang Jinhuan;Hou Dingkun;Wang Hao;Wang Haitao.(Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 300211 Tianjin, China)
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第12期910-913,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心个体化医学平台建设项目(13ZCZCSY20300) 国家自然科学基金项目(81071787)
关键词 尿路上皮癌 培美曲赛 二线治疗 Urothelial carcinoma Pemetrex Second-line therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

共引文献6

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部