期刊文献+

农产品价格波动对农业保险需求影响的研究 被引量:12

A Study on the Impact of Agricultural Product Price Fluctuation on Agricultural Insurance Demand
原文传递
导出
摘要 农产品价格频繁波动不仅让农产品生产者的收益面临不确定性,也影响着农户对农业保险的消费需求。文章运用状态空间模型和中介效应模型实证分析我国农产品价格波动对农户农业保险需求的影响。结果表明,农产品价格波动与农户农业保险需求之间存在长期稳定关系,并随时间的变化而变化。农产品价格同时通过直接效应和中介效应影响我国农户的农业保险需求。但目前政策诱导是我国农业保险发展的主要推动力,农产品价格波动对农户农业保险需求的推动作用较小。根据实证结果,本文提出了合理有效的发展农业保险,防范农产品价格波动风险建议。 Frequent fluctuations in agricultural prices not only affect the income of agricultural producers, but also makes the agricultural insurance consumption demand insta- bility. This paper uses the state space model and mediation effect model to studyhow agri- cultural product price fluctuation affects farmers' agricultural insurance demand. The re- sults show that there is a long-term stable relationship between agricultural product price fluctuation and farmers' agricultural insurance demand, and changes with time. Moreover, The price of agricultural products affects the agricultural insurance demand of farmers in our country through direct effects and intermediary effects at the same time. However, the pre- sent policy guidance is the main driving force for the development of agricultural insurance in our country. The fluctuation of agricultural products has less effect on the agricultural insurance demand of farmers. According to the empirical results, this paper puts forward rea- sonable and effective agricultural insurance to prevent the fluctuation risk of agricultural products.
作者 宋婷 陶建平
出处 《价格理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第11期126-129,共4页 Price:Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71173086) 国家自然科学基金青年资助项目(71503073) 中央高校自主科技创新基金资助项目(2662016PY080)
关键词 农产品价格波动 农业保险需求 状态空间模型 中介效应 Fluctuations in agricultural prices Agricultural insurance demand State space model Mediating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

  • 1冯海发.未来15年我国农业适度保护的政策选择[J].学习与探索,1998(6):20-29. 被引量:15
  • 2褚保一 杨思正.当代美国经济新编[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1989..
  • 3[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 4[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 5[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 6[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 7[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 8[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 9[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 10[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64

共引文献7780

同被引文献162

引证文献12

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部