“枫桥经验”中的多元法治图景

Multiple Legal Scenes in “Fengqiao Experience”

法律多元主义是上世纪六十年代诞生于西方的一个法学流派,它是身份和法律实践的多元化,反对以法律现代化为目的的分析实证法学,关注在法律领域内被国家中心权力排斥和边缘化的力量,多元的观念导致多元化的纠纷解决机制。枫桥经验产生于中国的东方小镇,可视为中国版本的法律多元主义,是法律多元主义的中国实践,在党的领导下,坚持矛盾不上交,通过网格化治理就地解决纠纷。枫桥经验是中国本土的法治实践,它积累了中国自己的法治经验,也遭遇了一些实际问题,在新的历史时期,如何在法治现代化和多元法律之间找到平衡,是时代赋予我们的新的历史使命。

Legal pluralism is a school of jurisprudence born in the west in the 1960s, which is a pluralism of identity and legal prac-tice. It opposes the analytical and empirical law for the purpose of legal modernization, and is concerned with the forces being ex-cluded and marginalized by the power of state center in the field of law. Pluralism leads to a wide range anisms. Fengqiao experience is derived from the oriental town of China and can be regarded as the Chinesism, a Chinese practice of legal pluralism. Under the leadership of the party, we disputes on-site through grid governance. Fengqiao experience is the native practice of rule of law in China, and has accumulatedChina’s own experience of rule of law and encountered some practical problems. In the new historical period,how to strike a bal-ance between the modernization of the law and the pluralism is the new historical mission