摘要
学术批评是学术研究与学术写作的本质特征之一,是学术创新的必由之路。现有关于学术批评的文献非常丰富,主要侧重界定学术批评或评价的内涵、作用、手段、变异、变迁等,但鲜有研究在分析过程中触及学术批评的不同方面,更没有研究尝试基于学术论文实例,建构学术批评的分析框架。本文基于国际核心期刊论文语料,在借鉴评价理论和语用学相关理论的基础上,提取了论文作者学术批评涉及的元素,尝试建构了论文写作中学术批评的分析框架,具体包括批评对象、批评维度、批评态度、批评策略、批评强度五个方面,各个方面又可以进一步区分不同的层面。
Academic criticism is one of the defining features of academic research and academic writing.It is also a necessary path towards academic innovation.Existing rich literature on academic criticism mainly focuses on its definition,functions,methods,variations,changes and the like,seldom touching its various aspects in the course of analysis,let alone attempting to construct an analytical framework for doing academic criticism on the basis of research article(RA) database.This paper thus draws on Appraisal Theory and related pragmatic theories to work out an analytical framework by singling out the major elements involved in academic criticism on the basis of sizable RA data from international journals.The constructed framework includes targets,dimensions,attitudes,strategies and intensities of criticism,each of which comprises some subcategories.
出处
《外语与外语教学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期34-44,共11页
Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词
学术写作
学术批评
评价
分析框架
academic writing
academic criticism
evaluation
analytical framework